Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 17, 2026

05:54
Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
2.4K
Immediate loading of implants in the aesthetic zone: comparison between two placement timings
Fabrizio Carini1, Salvatore Longoni1, Valeria Pisapia1
1Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Annali Di Stomatologia
|February 14, 2015
Summary
Immediate loading of dental implants in aesthetic zones is a predictable option. While both immediate and delayed placement showed similar stability, immediate post-extraction implants had more gingival recession and radiolucency.
Area of Science:
- Dental Implantology
- Prosthodontics
- Periodontology
Background:
- Traditional implant protocols offer high predictability.
- Immediate loading of dental implants, particularly in aesthetic zones, is increasingly common.
- The TSA® Advance, Phibo® implant system features a tapered design with highly porous microgeometry.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the immediate loading of TSA® Advance, Phibo® implants in the aesthetic zone.
- To compare implants placed immediately post-extraction versus those placed 4-8 weeks after avulsion.
- To assess implant success, stability, and aesthetic outcomes.
Main Methods:
- 15 TSA® Advance, Phibo® implants were placed: 7 immediately post-extraction (type 1) and 8 at 4-8 weeks (type 2).
- All implants were prosthetically restored within 24 hours, with definitive crowns placed after 20-24 weeks.
- Outcomes assessed at 4 and 12 months included X-rays, pain, mobility, suppuration, soft tissue condition, and aesthetics (PES/WES).
Main Results:
- 93.75% overall osseointegration rate, with 53.5% in type 2 implants.
- No significant difference in implant stability (ISQ values) between type 1 and type 2 implants.
- Immediate post-extraction implants exhibited increased gingival recession and peri-implant radiolucency compared to delayed placement.
Conclusions:
- Immediate/early placement and loading of TSA® Advance, Phibo® implants are a valuable and predictable option for implant success and tissue stability.
- The technique demonstrates considerable aesthetic value and high patient satisfaction.
- Further high-quality randomized clinical trials are needed to establish standardized aesthetic outcome evaluation.

