Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Personalized 3D-printed Headgear for Multi-electrode Transcranial Electrical Stimulation
Published on: September 9, 2025
Personalizing the Electrode to Neuromodulate an Extended Cortical Region
A Cancelli1, C Cottone2, M Di Giorgio3
1Laboratory of Electrophysiology for Translational neuroScience (LET'S) - ISTC - CNR, Department of Neuroscience, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Rome, Italy; Institute of Neurology, Department of Geriatrics, Neurosciences & Orthopaedics, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Background:
Among transcranial electric stimulation (tES) parameters, personalizing the electrode geometry might help overcome the individual variability of the induced effects.
Objective/Hypothesis:
To test the need for electrode personalization, instead of a universal electrode for everyone, to induce neuromodulation effects on the bilateral primary motor cortex (M1) devoted to upper and lower limb representation.
Methods:
By an ad-hoc neuronavigation procedure, we shaped the personalized electrode and positioned it matching the projection on the scalp of the individual central sulcus by a 2 cm strip, with total area of 35 cm(2). The non-personalized electrode, i.e., equal for all subjects, was a 2 cm wide strip size-matched with the personalized electrode but shaped on a standard model fitting the curve passing through C3-CZ-C4 sites of the electroencephalographic (EEG) 10-20 International System. To test neuromodulation electrode-dependent efficacy, we induced a 20 Hz sinusoidal modulated current (transcranial alternating current stimulation, tACS) because it produces online effects. We simultaneously collected left and right hand and leg motor potentials (MEP) that were evoked by a rounded transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coil. Through each electrode we delivered both real and sham stimulations.
Results:
While cortical excitability during tACS increased during both the non-personalized and the personalized electrodes for the leg, the hand representation excitability enhancement was induced selectively when using the personalized electrode. The results were consistent bilaterally.
Conclusions:
We documented that by using a personalized electrode it is possible to induce the neuromodulation of a predetermined extended cortical target, which did not occur with a non-personalized electrode. Our findings can help in building neuromodulation methods that might compensate for individual alterations across specific brain networks.

