Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
Lost in time...: The search for intentions and Readiness Potentials.
Ceci Verbaarschot1, Jason Farquhar1, Pim Haselager1
1Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Libet-style experiments investigating the Readiness Potential (RP) and intention to act reveal that technical details critically influence results. Individual analyses, not averages, are crucial for understanding the RP-intention relationship and free will debates.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Philosophy of Mind
- Cognitive Science
Background:
- Libet et al. (1983) reported the Readiness Potential (RP) precedes voluntary action intention and movement.
- This finding has significant implications for debates on free will and determinism.
- Replication studies are essential to validate and refine understanding of these complex neuroscientific findings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To replicate Libet's findings on the temporal relationship between the Readiness Potential (RP) and the intention to act.
- To investigate the impact of technical methodological details on the interpretation of Libet-style experiments.
- To critically evaluate the conclusions drawn about free will based on RP data.
Main Methods:
- Conducted a replication study of Libet's experimental paradigm.
- Employed precise electroencephalography (EEG) techniques to measure neural activity (RP).
- Utilized subjective reporting to determine the timing of the intention to act.
Main Results:
- A specific method for determining RP onset unexpectedly reversed Libet's findings for one participant, showing intention preceding RP.
- Analysis of averages can obscure crucial individual variations in the RP and intention timing.
- Case-by-case analyses revealed no exceptions to the temporal precedence of RP over intention.
Conclusions:
- Technical details in Libet-style experiments significantly impact observed results and their interpretation.
- Claims about the causal link between RP and intention require meticulous individual analysis, not just group averages.
- Current Libet-style experimental results are insufficient to definitively disprove the existence of free will.
More Related Videos
11:14A Novel Experimental and Analytical Approach to the Multimodal Neural Decoding of Intent During Social Interaction in Freely-behaving Human Infants
Published on: October 4, 2015
07:14Virtual Agent for Real-Time Motivational Interviewing by Integrating Adaptive Nonverbal Behavior and Language Models
Published on: December 23, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior
Introspection
Potential Energy
Chemical bonds that form attractive forces between atoms also contain potential energy, called chemical energy. When a chemical reaction...
Potential Energy
Reason and Intuition
Attitudes