Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes

Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes

Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes

Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes

While every living organism has a genome of some kind (be it RNA, or DNA), there is considerable variation in the sizes of these blueprints. One major factor that impacts genome size is whether the organism is prokaryotic or eukaryotic. In prokaryotes, the genome contains little to no non-coding sequence, such that genes are tightly clustered in groups or operons sequentially along the chromosome. Conversely, the genes in eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of non-coding sequence.

Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes

Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes

The present-day mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes have retained some of the characteristics of their ancestral prokaryotes and also have acquired new attributes during their evolution within eukaryotic cells. Like prokaryotic genomes, mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes neither bind with histone-like proteins nor show complex packaging into chromosome-like structures, as observed in eukaryotes. Unlike mitotic cell divisions observed in eukaryotic cells, mitochondria and chloroplasts...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Zebrafish models of developmental epileptic encephalopathy accurately reflect clinical electrographic biomarkers.

Epilepsia·2025

Same author

ListiWiki: A database for the foodborne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes.

International journal of medical microbiology : IJMM·2023

Same author

App-SpaM: phylogenetic placement of short reads without sequence alignment.

Bioinformatics advances·2023

Same author

<i>Myco</i>Wiki: Functional annotation of the minimal model organism <i>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</i>.

Frontiers in microbiology·2022

Same author

Insertions and deletions as phylogenetic signal in an alignment-free context.

PLoS computational biology·2022

Same author

Genome and Methylome analysis of a phylogenetic novel <i>Campylobacter coli</i> cluster with <i>C. jejuni</i> introgression.

Microbial genomics·2021

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 17, 2026

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

Estimating evolutionary distances between genomic sequences from spaced-word matches.

Burkhard Morgenstern¹, Bingyao Zhu², Sebastian Horwege³

¹University of Göttingen, Department of Bioinformatics, Goldschmidtstr. 1, Göttingen, 37073 Germany ; Université d'Evry Val d'Essonne, Laboratoire Statistique et Génome, UMR CNRS 8071, USC INRA 23 Boulevard de France, Evry, 91037 France.

Algorithms for Molecular Biology : AMB

|February 17, 2015

Summary

This study introduces a new alignment-free method for calculating evolutionary distances between DNA sequences using spaced word matches. This approach offers improved accuracy and reduced variance compared to existing methods.

Keywords:

Alignment-free Distance estimation Genome comparison Phylogeny Spaced words Variance Word frequency k-mers

More Related Videos

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Published on: August 14, 2018

Single Cell Multiplex Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction After Patch-clamp

Single Cell Multiplex Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction After Patch-clamp

Published on: June 20, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 17, 2026

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Published on: August 14, 2018

Single Cell Multiplex Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction After Patch-clamp

Single Cell Multiplex Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction After Patch-clamp

Published on: June 20, 2018

Area of Science:

Bioinformatics
Computational Biology
Molecular Evolution

Background:

Alignment-free methods are gaining traction for phylogenetic reconstruction.
Existing methods often lack explicit models of molecular evolution.
Accurate evolutionary distance estimation is crucial for understanding evolutionary relationships.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose a novel, model-based estimator for evolutionary distances between DNA sequences.
To enhance the accuracy and reduce variance in alignment-free distance calculations.
To provide a more robust method for phylogeny reconstruction.

Main Methods:

Development of a simple estimator, d N, based on the number of spaced word matches (N).
Calculation and analysis of the variance of the normalized number of spaced word matches.
Comparison of the proposed method's accuracy against existing alignment-free distance measures.

Main Results:

The proposed d N estimator demonstrates higher accuracy than other alignment-free distance measures.
Spaced words exhibit lower variance in match counts compared to contiguous words.
Utilizing multiple patterns of match/don't care positions further reduces variance.

Conclusions:

The novel spaced-word approach provides a more accurate and statistically robust method for estimating evolutionary distances.
This method improves upon existing alignment-free techniques for DNA sequence analysis.
The developed software is publicly available for broader scientific application.