Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Author Spotlight: Utilizing Next-Generation Polymerized Human Hemoglobin for Improved Donor Lung Evaluation and Preservation in Rats
Published on: June 14, 2024
Haemoconcentration of residual cardiopulmonary bypass blood using Hemosep ®: a randomised controlled trial
M Hogan1, A Needham, E Ortmann
1Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Cardiac surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass are associated with haemodilution, activation of haemostasis and blood transfusion. We undertook a randomised controlled trial that included 53 patients in order to compare autotransfusion of residual cardiopulmonary bypass blood with residual blood concentrated using the novel Hemosep(®) device. There was no difference in patients' mean (SD) haemoglobin concentration after autotransfusion of unprocessed blood compared with Hemosep; 103.5 (10.2) g.l(-1) vs 106.2 (12.4) g.l(-1), respectively, p = 0.40. The mean (SD) change in haemoglobin concentration after autotransfusion was 5.9 (5.3) g.l(-1) in the control group compared with 4.9 (6.3) g.l(-1) in the Hemosep group, p = 0.545. Adjusted for baseline haemoglobin concentrations, the estimated mean (95% CI) difference in change in haemoglobin concentration (control vs Hemosep) was 0.57 (-2.65 to 3.79) g.l(-1), p = 0.72. This was despite Hemosep's reducing the weight of the blood from a mean (SD) of 778.7 (243.0) g to 607.3 (248.2) g, p < 0.001. The haemoglobin concentration in the processed blood increased from a mean (SD) of 87.0 (15.1) g.l(-1) to 103.7 (17.4) g.l(-1), p < 0.001. We conclude that Hemosep is capable of haemoconcentration when employed to process residual cardiopulmonary bypass blood, but that this is insufficient to increase patient haemoglobin.
Cardiac surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass are associated with haemodilution, activation of haemostasis and blood transfusion. We undertook a randomised controlled trial that included 53 patients in order to compare autotransfusion of residual cardiopulmonary bypass blood with residual blood concentrated using the novel Hemosep(®) device. There was no difference in patients' mean (SD) haemoglobin concentration after autotransfusion of unprocessed blood compared with Hemosep; 103.5 (10.2) g.l(-1) vs 106.2 (12.4) g.l(-1), respectively, p = 0.40. The mean (SD) change in haemoglobin concentration after autotransfusion was 5.9 (5.3) g.l(-1) in the control group compared with 4.9 (6.3) g.l(-1) in the Hemosep group, p = 0.545. Adjusted for baseline haemoglobin concentrations, the estimated mean (95% CI) difference in change in haemoglobin concentration (control vs Hemosep) was 0.57 (-2.65 to 3.79) g.l(-1), p = 0.72. This was despite Hemosep's reducing the weight of the blood from a mean (SD) of 778.7 (243.0) g to 607.3 (248.2) g, p < 0.001. The haemoglobin concentration in the processed blood increased from a mean (SD) of 87.0 (15.1) g.l(-1) to 103.7 (17.4) g.l(-1), p < 0.001. We conclude that Hemosep is capable of haemoconcentration when employed to process residual cardiopulmonary bypass blood, but that this is insufficient to increase patient haemoglobin.
More Related Videos
09:10Normothermic Ex Situ Heart Perfusion in Working Mode: Assessment of Cardiac Function and Metabolism
Published on: January 12, 2019
08:15Innovative Strategies for Organ Preservation in Heart Transplantation: Uniform Cooling Preservation and Ex-situ Normothermic Perfusion
Published on: November 28, 2025