Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing
Published on: February 24, 2015
Disclosing bias in bisulfite assay: MethPrimers underestimate high DNA methylation
Andrea Fuso1, Giampiero Ferraguti2, Sigfrido Scarpa3
1Dept. of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; European Center for Brain Research (CERC)/IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Abstract:
Discordant results obtained in bisulfite assays using MethPrimers (PCR primers designed using MethPrimer software or assuming that non-CpGs cytosines are non methylated) versus primers insensitive to cytosine methylation lead us to hypothesize a technical bias. We therefore used the two kinds of primers to study different experimental models and methylation statuses. We demonstrated that MethPrimers negatively select hypermethylated DNA sequences in the PCR step of the bisulfite assay, resulting in CpG methylation underestimation and non-CpG methylation masking, failing to evidence differential methylation statuses. We also describe the characteristics of "Methylation-Insensitive Primers" (MIPs), having degenerated bases (G/A) to cope with the uncertain C/U conversion. As CpG and non-CpG DNA methylation patterns are largely variable depending on the species, developmental stage, tissue and cell type, a variable extent of the bias is expected. The more the methylome is methylated, the greater is the extent of the bias, with a prevalent effect of non-CpG methylation. These findings suggest a revision of several DNA methylation patterns so far documented and also point out the necessity of applying unbiased analyses to the increasing number of epigenomic studies.

