Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

The scientific method provides the foundation for any research. It is the most reliable and objective of all forms of gaining knowledge and guides in applying research-based evidence in practice and conducting future research.
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...

Decision Making

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

Decision Making: P-value Method

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...

Decision Making: Traditional Method

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...

Hazard Ratio

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

CKD in Africa: A Call to Urgent, Coordinated Action.

American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation·2026

Same author

Pneumococcal meningitis among hospitalised children after introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in India: a sentinel hospital surveillance (2019-2022).

The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia·2026

Same author

Viral threats to pregnancy: Global health risks in the era of pandemics.

Advances in virus research·2026

Same author

Implementing the commitments of the World Health Assembly kidney health resolution: a key opportunity to improve health for millions.

Lancet (London, England)·2026

Same author

Introducing the Investigator Global Assessment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa (I-GLASS) instrument.

The British journal of dermatology·2026

Same author

Hidradenitis Suppurativa and Risk of Self-Harm and Suicide.

JAMA dermatology·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

Evidence-based decision-making 2: Systematic reviews and meta-analysis.

Aminu Bello¹, Natasha Wiebe, Amit Garg

¹Division of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.)

|February 20, 2015

Summary

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses synthesize biomedical literature, aiding clinical decisions. These evidence-based summaries help reconcile conflicting study findings and inform medical practice.

More Related Videos

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia

Published on: February 17, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia

Published on: February 17, 2023

Area of Science:

Biomedical Literature Synthesis
Evidence-Based Medicine
Clinical Decision Support

Background:

The biomedical literature has grown exponentially, increasing complexity in clinical medicine.
Synthesizing information from diverse studies is challenging due to variations in design, quality, and methodology.
Reconciling conflicting findings from multiple studies is crucial for informed clinical decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

To summarize methods for conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
To provide guidance on reading and interpreting systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
To describe the advantages and disadvantages of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Main Methods:

Systematic literature search and data extraction.
Critical appraisal of study quality and risk of bias.
Statistical synthesis of data (meta-analysis) where appropriate.

Main Results:

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses provide a comprehensive overview of available evidence.
These methods help to resolve discrepancies between individual studies.
They offer a reliable source of information for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment.

Conclusions:

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential tools for navigating the vast biomedical literature.
They enhance the reliability of evidence used in clinical practice.
Understanding their methodology is key to their effective application and interpretation.