Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design01:28

Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design

2.2K
Drug design is a dynamic field that involves discovering and developing new medications based on specific biological targets. This process heavily relies on structure-activity relationships (SAR) and quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) to guide the design and optimization of efficient drugs.
SAR studies the intricate relationship between a drug's chemical structure and biological activity. It focuses on understanding how modifications to a drug's structure can influence...
2.2K
Adrenergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship01:16

Adrenergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship

4.2K
Adrenergic agonists' structure-activity relationship (SAR) determines their selectivity and efficacy. These agonists comprise a phenylethylamine moiety with an aromatic ring and an ethylamine side chain.
Aromatic ring substitutions: Substituting the aromatic ring with –OH groups at positions 3 and 4 yields catecholamines (e.g., epinephrine), which have a high affinity for adrenoceptors. Hydrogen bonding between –OH groups and receptors enhances adrenergic activity.
Separation of...
4.2K
Dose-Response Relationship: Overview01:03

Dose-Response Relationship: Overview

6.1K
Agonists can bind with and activate receptors, resulting in the formation of drug-receptor complexes. Once formed, these complexes catalyze many biochemical processes at the cellular level and subsequently induce a pharmacologic response. The degree of response is directly proportional to the fraction of activated receptors, which in turn, depends on the concentration of the drug at the receptor site as well as the sensitivity of the receptor. An increase in the administered dose contributes to...
6.1K
Drug-Receptor Interactions01:29

Drug-Receptor Interactions

8.5K
Drug-receptor interaction describes the binding of receptors by drugs, but not all drug-receptor interactions result in activation and tissue response. For instance, the binding of agonists activates the receptor to generate a cellular reaction, while antagonists bind to receptors without causing their activation.
Several parameters, such as the drug's affinity for its receptor and its efficacy, which is its ability to activate the receptor, determine the drug's effect on the tissue....
8.5K
Direct-Acting Cholinergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship01:22

Direct-Acting Cholinergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship

2.6K
Cholinergic agonists or cholinomimetics mimic the action of acetylcholine to stimulate the parasympathetic nervous system. They are categorized into direct-acting and indirect-acting agents. The direct-acting cholinergic drugs induce the parasympathetic response by directly binding to the muscarinic or nicotine receptors. In comparison, the indirect-acting cholinergic drugs prevent acetylcholine hydrolysis, indirectly contributing to the extended parasympathetic response.
The direct-acting...
2.6K
The Two-State Receptor Model01:29

The Two-State Receptor Model

3.6K
The two-state receptor model explains a drug's interaction with receptors, such as G protein-coupled receptors and ligand-gated ion channels, to induce or inhibit a biological response. When no natural ligands are present, a receptor exists in an equilibrium of inactive (Ri) and active (Ra) conformations. The inactive form does not produce a response, while the active form generates a basal effect known as constitutive activity.
The binding affinity of a drug determines its interaction with...
3.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prediction of activity cliffs on the basis of images using convolutional neural networks.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2021
Same author

Evolution of assay interference concepts in drug discovery.

Expert opinion on drug discovery·2021
Same author

Adapting the DeepSARM approach for dual-target ligand design.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2021
Same author

Data set of competitive and allosteric protein kinase inhibitors confirmed by X-ray crystallography.

Data in brief·2021
Same author

Evaluation of multi-target deep neural network models for compound potency prediction under increasingly challenging test conditions.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2021
Same author

Predicting Isoform-Selective Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors via Machine Learning and Rationalizing Structural Features Important for Selectivity.

ACS omega·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
10:29

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Published on: May 9, 2025

2.7K

Structural and Activity Profile Relationships Between Drug Scaffolds.

Ye Hu1, Jürgen Bajorath

  • 1Department of Life Science Informatics, B-IT, LIMES Program Unit Chemical Biology and Medicinal Chemistry, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Dahlmannstr. 2, 53113, Bonn, Germany.

The AAPS Journal
|February 21, 2015
PubMed
Summary

This study organizes drug scaffolds by structure and activity, revealing relationships to aid drug discovery and target identification. This scaffold organization provides insights into drug activity profiles and potential new drug targets.

More Related Videos

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English
14:34

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English

Published on: April 3, 2026

215
Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

1.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
10:29

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Published on: May 9, 2025

2.7K
A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English
14:34

A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English

Published on: April 3, 2026

215
Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

1.6K

Area of Science:

  • Medicinal Chemistry
  • Pharmacology
  • Computational Drug Discovery

Background:

  • Drug scaffolds are fundamental to drug structure and function.
  • Understanding scaffold relationships is crucial for drug development.
  • Existing methods for comparing drug scaffolds are limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically analyze structural and activity profile relationships of drug scaffolds.
  • To introduce consensus activity profiles for assessing scaffold similarity.
  • To organize drug scaffolds based on structural and activity criteria for drug discovery.

Main Methods:

  • Assembled core drug structures and analyzed their relationships.
  • Explored activity profiles of structurally related drug scaffolds.
  • Compared scaffold relationships between drugs and bioactive compounds.
  • Developed and applied consensus activity profiles for quantitative assessment.

Main Results:

  • Drug scaffolds exhibit diverse structural and activity relationships.
  • Systematic differences were found between drug and bioactive compound scaffolds.
  • Consensus activity profiles effectively differentiate drug scaffolds.
  • Scaffolds representing drugs with distinct or similar target profiles were identified.

Conclusions:

  • Drug scaffold organization based on structure and activity enhances understanding.
  • Consensus activity profiles offer a novel approach for drug similarity assessment.
  • This work provides a systematic scaffold classification and freely available data for drug discovery research.