Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Building Up a High-throughput Screening Platform to Assess the Heterogeneity of HER2 Gene Amplification in Breast Cancers
Published on: December 5, 2017
An international study to increase concordance in Ki67 scoring
Mei-Yin C Polley1, Samuel C Y Leung2, Dongxia Gao2
1Biometric Research Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Standardizing Ki67 scoring in breast cancer labs improved reproducibility using a web-based tool. While promising, further research is needed to address remaining discrepancies for clinical use.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pathology
- Biomarker Standardization
Background:
- Ki67 is a crucial breast cancer biomarker, but its clinical utility is hindered by a lack of standardized scoring methods.
- Previous studies highlighted significant variability in Ki67 scoring among different laboratories.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the effectiveness of a standardized Ki67 scoring method using a web-based calibration tool.
- To improve inter-laboratory reproducibility for Ki67 assessment in breast cancer tissue microarray slides.
Main Methods:
- 16 laboratories from eight countries calibrated to a specific Ki67 scoring protocol via web-based training and test images.
- Laboratories then scored 50 centrally stained MIB-1 tissue microarray cases using the standardized method.
- Performance was evaluated using Root Mean Square Error, Maximum Absolute Deviation, and intraclass correlation (ICC).
Main Results:
- Calibration showed promising trends in reducing scoring errors (RMSE decreased from 0.6 to 0.4, P=0.07).
- Post-calibration, tissue microarray scoring achieved a high ICC of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90-0.97), exceeding the target of >0.70.
- Despite improvements, some discrepancies persisted, particularly around clinically relevant cutoffs.
Conclusions:
- A standardized Ki67 scoring method, facilitated by a web-based tool, can achieve high inter-laboratory reproducibility on tissue microarray slides.
- The findings suggest standardization is feasible but emphasize the need for further research.
- Future studies should address staining variability, extend to biopsies/whole sections, and correlate with clinical outcomes before widespread clinical adoption.
More Related Videos
11:24High-throughput Imaging and Analysis Workflow for Evaluating Skin Cell Phenotypes and Proliferation States in Tissue Samples
Published on: October 31, 2025
08:40Quantitation of Protein Expression and Co-localization Using Multiplexed Immuno-histochemical Staining and Multispectral Imaging
Published on: April 8, 2016