Meta-Analysis of Cell-based CaRdiac stUdiEs (ACCRUE) in patients with acute myocardial infarction based on individual

Circulation Research
|February 21, 2015
PubMed

Insights

Intracoronary cell therapy after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) showed no significant benefit in reducing major adverse cardiac events or improving left ventricular function in this large meta-analysis. These findings question the efficacy of current cell-based treatments for ischemic heart disease.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Regenerative Medicine
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • The meta-Analysis of Cell-based CaRdiac study is the first multinational database of patients with ischemic heart disease receiving cell therapy.
  • It compiles individual patient data from 12 randomized trials.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the safety and efficacy of intracoronary cell therapy post-acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
  • To evaluate the impact of cell therapy on major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events and left ventricular function.

Main Methods:

  • Individual patient data from 12 randomized trials (n=1252) were analyzed.
  • Random-effects meta-analyses and Cox regressions were used to assess clinical endpoints.
  • ANCOVA was employed to analyze changes in left ventricular parameters.

Main Results:

  • No significant difference was observed in major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (14.0% vs 16.3%) between cell therapy and control groups.
  • No improvements were noted in hard clinical endpoints like death (1.4% vs 2.1%) or stroke.
  • There were no significant changes in ejection fraction, end-diastolic volume, or end-systolic volume.

Conclusions:

  • Intracoronary cell therapy offers no discernible benefit for clinical events or left ventricular function in patients with recent AMI.
  • These findings are consistent across subgroups, including those with anterior AMI or reduced baseline ejection fraction.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos