Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Obstetric management for stillbirth complicated by a prior cesarean delivery: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians·2020

Same author

In Reply.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2020

Same author

The Cost of a Fall Among Older Adults Requiring Emergency Services.

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society·2020

Same author

Predicting vaginal birth after previous cesarean: Using machine-learning models and a population-based cohort in Sweden.

Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica·2020

Same author

Extending the second stage of labor in nulliparous women with epidural analgesia: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians·2020

Same author

In Reply.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2020

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on a Semiconductor Based Next-Generation Sequencing Platform

Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on a Semiconductor Based Next-Generation Sequencing Platform

Published on: August 17, 2022

Preference-sensitive risk-cutoff values for prenatal-integrated screening test for Down syndrome.

Jia Yan¹, Turgay Ayer¹, Pinar Keskinocak¹

¹H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Prenatal Diagnosis

|February 24, 2015

Summary

The optimal risk cutoff for Down syndrome (DS) screening depends on individual patient preferences, not a universal 1/270 value. Tailoring cutoffs can improve pregnancy outcomes and satisfaction.

More Related Videos

Semiconductor Sequencing for Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy

Semiconductor Sequencing for Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy

Published on: August 25, 2019

Chromosome Screening of Human Preimplantation Embryos by Using Spent Culture Medium: Sample Collection and Chromosomal Ploidy Analysis

Chromosome Screening of Human Preimplantation Embryos by Using Spent Culture Medium: Sample Collection and Chromosomal Ploidy Analysis

Published on: September 7, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on a Semiconductor Based Next-Generation Sequencing Platform

Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on a Semiconductor Based Next-Generation Sequencing Platform

Published on: August 17, 2022

Semiconductor Sequencing for Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy

Semiconductor Sequencing for Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy

Published on: August 25, 2019

Chromosome Screening of Human Preimplantation Embryos by Using Spent Culture Medium: Sample Collection and Chromosomal Ploidy Analysis

Chromosome Screening of Human Preimplantation Embryos by Using Spent Culture Medium: Sample Collection and Chromosomal Ploidy Analysis

Published on: September 7, 2021

Area of Science:

Maternal-fetal medicine
Prenatal diagnostics
Reproductive health

Background:

Prenatal screening for Down syndrome (DS) involves balancing the risks of undetected DS live births against procedure-related fetal losses.
A common risk cutoff of 1/270 is used to recommend diagnostic testing.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate how women's preferences for different pregnancy outcomes influence the ideal risk cutoff values for integrated prenatal screening.
To determine if a personalized approach to risk cutoff values can enhance screening effectiveness.

Main Methods:

A Monte Carlo simulation model was developed, analyzing 100,000 second-trimester pregnancies.
The model assessed probabilities of DS live births and euploid fetal losses under varying risk cutoff values.
A ratio of weights (W1:W2) was used to quantify the relative undesirability of each adverse outcome according to patient preferences.

Main Results:

The optimal risk cutoff value for DS screening demonstrated significant variability in response to changes in the relative weighting of adverse outcomes.
This indicates that a fixed risk cutoff may not be universally applicable.

Conclusions:

A standardized risk cutoff of 1/270 may not be optimal for all pregnant women undergoing DS screening.
Implementing preference-sensitive risk cutoff values has the potential to improve overall pregnancy outcomes and patient satisfaction.
Personalized risk assessment in prenatal screening can lead to better patient-centered care.