Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Macular Pigment Optical Density as a Measurable Modifiable Clinical Biomarker.

Nutrients·2024
Same author

Effect of Lipiflow (Thermal Pulsation) on Ocular Surface Disease Management After Cataract Surgery.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)·2024
Same author

Intraocular Pressure and Myopia Progression, Axial Length Elongation in Rural Chinese Children.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2023
Same author

A comparative study of the prevalence of myopia and behavioral changes in primary school students.

BMC ophthalmology·2022
Same author

Elementary school comprehensive intervention and myopia development: the Wenzhou Epidemiology of Refraction Error Study.

International journal of ophthalmology·2022
Same author

Analysis of the Reliability and Repeatability of Distance Visual Acuity Measurement with EyeSpy 20/20.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)·2022
Same journal

Agreement in the classification of keratoconus severity: a comparative study based on anterior corneal surface topographic parameters.

Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association·2026
Same journal

The answer is 23 years - what is the question? Understanding the time lag between ophthalmic research and clinical adoption.

Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association·2026
Same journal

Orthokeratology versus extended depth-of-focus soft contact lenses for myopia control: a 12-month comparative study of axial elongation and corneal changes.

Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association·2026
Same journal

Development of a model for the clinical prediction of contact lens discomfort.

Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association·2026
Same journal

Effect of a head strap on the function of an eyelid warming compress.

Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association·2026
Same journal

Corneal nerve alterations in migraine: a systematic review of in vivo confocal microscopy and esthesiometry findings.

Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Development of an In Vitro Ocular Platform to Test Contact Lenses
08:28

Development of an In Vitro Ocular Platform to Test Contact Lenses

Published on: April 6, 2016

11.4K

Low toric soft contact lens acceptance study.

Sara N Gaib1, Balamurali Vasudevan1

  • 1Midwestern University, United States.

Contact Lens & Anterior Eye : the Journal of the British Contact Lens Association
|February 24, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study found no significant difference in visual performance between custom toric contact lenses and standard spherical lenses for individuals with mild astigmatism. Both lens types offered comparable objective and subjective vision quality.

Keywords:
AstigmatismContact lensContrast sensitivitySoft lensToric lensVisual acuity

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Establishing a Practical and Cost-Effective Protocol for Corneal Sensitivity Testing in Clinical Settings
04:00

Author Spotlight: Establishing a Practical and Cost-Effective Protocol for Corneal Sensitivity Testing in Clinical Settings

Published on: August 2, 2024

3.6K
Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients
07:06

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients

Published on: March 29, 2022

3.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Development of an In Vitro Ocular Platform to Test Contact Lenses
08:28

Development of an In Vitro Ocular Platform to Test Contact Lenses

Published on: April 6, 2016

11.4K
Author Spotlight: Establishing a Practical and Cost-Effective Protocol for Corneal Sensitivity Testing in Clinical Settings
04:00

Author Spotlight: Establishing a Practical and Cost-Effective Protocol for Corneal Sensitivity Testing in Clinical Settings

Published on: August 2, 2024

3.6K
Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients
07:06

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients

Published on: March 29, 2022

3.5K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Optometry
  • Vision Science

Background:

  • Astigmatism management often involves specialized contact lenses.
  • Toric contact lenses correct astigmatism, while spherical lenses offer standard correction.
  • Evaluating visual performance in low astigmats is crucial for lens selection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the visual performance of custom toric contact lenses (TL) versus off-the-shelf spherical lenses (SL).
  • To assess both objective and subjective visual outcomes in subjects with low astigmatism.

Main Methods:

  • Twenty-three soft contact lens wearers with low astigmatism (0.50-1.00DC) were enrolled.
  • Lenses fitted included Air Optix Aqua (spherical) and Intelliwave toric lenses.
  • Visual performance was tested using comprehensive objective and subjective evaluations.

Main Results:

  • High contrast distance visual acuity (HCDVA) was better with spectacles than SL in the morning and afternoon.
  • HCDVA was significantly better with TL compared to SL in the afternoon.
  • Low contrast distance visual acuity (LCDVA) was better with spectacles than SL.
  • No clinically significant differences in visual acuity or subjective ratings were found between SL and TL.

Conclusions:

  • No clinically significant difference in visual performance exists between spherical and toric soft contact lenses for individuals with low astigmatism.
  • Both lens types provide comparable visual outcomes in this patient group.