Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Psychosurgery01:30

Psychosurgery

2.4K
Psychosurgery, the surgical alteration or permanent removal of brain tissue to alleviate severe psychological conditions, stands as one of the most radical and controversial treatments in the history of mental health care. Its development and application have evolved significantly, marked by dramatic shifts in scientific understanding and ethical perspectives.
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
2.4K
Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

2.9K
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
2.9K
Treatment Strategies for Psychological Disorders01:24

Treatment Strategies for Psychological Disorders

948
Treatment approaches for psychological disorders fall into three main categories: psychological, biological, and sociocultural. Each approach targets different aspects of mental health, requiring varying levels of education and training.
Psychological therapies focus on modifying emotions, thoughts, and behaviors through talking, interpreting, listening, rewarding, challenging, and modeling. Clinical psychologists, counselors, and social workers commonly practice psychotherapy. Clinical...
948
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

26.3K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
26.3K
Ethics and Bioethics01:22

Ethics and Bioethics

3.6K
Ethics is a philosophical study of moral actions. Ethics attempts to determine what is valuable for individuals and society. It examines the rational justification of moral judgments and analyzes what is morally just, fair, and right. Bioethics is a sub-discipline of applied ethics that analyzes the philosophical, social, and legal issues in life sciences and medicine. Ethical theories serve as a foundation for decision-making and represent the viewpoints from which people seek direction. They...
3.6K
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-I01:30

Specialized Care Centers and Settings-I

1.5K
Specialized care settings or centers are situated in convenient locations within the community and offer care to a specific group or population. They consist of daycare facilities, mental health facilities, rural health facilities, educational institutions, industries, shelters for the homeless, and rehabilitation facilities.
Daycare centers
They provide several functions. Some facilities care for healthy newborns and children whose parents work, while others are medically focused and care for...
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The use of pharmacodynamic results for recommended phase II decision making in oncology clinical trials.

Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology·2026
Same author

A unified medical response to gender-based violence.

South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde·2026
Same author

Cost implications of early treatment discontinuation in cancer: a real-world data analysis.

The oncologist·2026
Same author

Access to anticancer and orphan medicines through compassionate use programs and named patient basis in seven European countries.

ESMO open·2025
Same author

The narrow road to expanded access.

Journal of cancer policy·2024
Same author

Time to reimbursement of novel anticancer drugs in Europe: a case study of seven European countries.

ESMO open·2023
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

25.0K

'Single' v. 'panel' appointed forensic mental observations: Is the referral process ethically justifiable?

T Schutte1, U Subramaney1

  • 1Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

South African Journal of Bioethics and Law
|February 24, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Forensic mental observation referrals for seriously violent offenders (

More Related Videos

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
06:04

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

Published on: January 17, 2025

1.8K
Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

9.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

25.0K
Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
06:04

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

Published on: January 17, 2025

1.8K
Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

9.4K

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Psychiatry
  • Legal Psychology
  • Criminal Justice

Background:

  • Forensic mental observations are crucial for determining trial competency and criminal responsibility.
  • Different legal frameworks categorize detainees awaiting trial into groups based on offense severity and evaluation methods.
  • Understanding outcomes for these distinct groups is vital for judicial and psychiatric practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare psychiatric morbidity and outcomes between "singles" (minor offenders, single psychiatrist) and "panels" (serious offenders, multiple psychiatrists).
  • To analyze the differences in fitness for trial and criminal responsibility assessments.
  • To evaluate the impact of evaluation group on legal and psychiatric determinations.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective record review of 200 forensic psychiatric observations at Sterkfontein Hospital (January-August 2010).
  • Categorization of cases into 'singles' (n=110) and 'panels' (n=90) based on legal criteria.
  • Statistical analysis using Pearson's chi-squared test for categorical data.

Main Results:

  • Significantly higher rates of fitness for trial (66.67% vs. 44.55%) and criminal responsibility (64.77% vs. 40.4%) were found in the 'panel' group compared to the 'singles' group (p=0.002 and p=0.001).
  • The 'panel' group, representing seriously violent offenders, demonstrated better outcomes in legal-psychiatric evaluations.
  • The 'singles' group, comprising minor offenders, showed lower rates of being found fit for trial and criminally responsible.

Conclusions:

  • Offenders charged with serious violent offenses are more likely to be deemed fit for trial and criminally responsible.
  • The severity of the offense appears to be a significant factor in forensic mental observation outcomes.
  • This suggests potential disparities in legal-psychiatric assessments based on offense categorization.