Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 17, 2026
Application of a New Mesh Fixation Method in Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair
Published on: December 23, 2022
Inguinal hernia repair in premature infants: more questions than answers
Eileen M Duggan1, Vikram P Patel2, Martin L Blakely3
1Department of General Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Insights
Outcomes for premature infants with intestinalхід (IH) vary based on surgical repair timing. A large multicenter trial is underway to determine optimal timing for improved infant surgical care.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal surgery
- Pediatric surgery
- Surgical outcomes
Background:
- Numerous single-institution studies exist on premature infant outcomes with intestinalхід (IH).
- These studies often involve small patient numbers and retrospective designs, limiting definitive conclusions on optimal treatment.
- Existing research indicates high risks and potential outcome variations based on repair timing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review existing literature on the outcomes of premature infants undergoing intestinalхід (IH) repair.
- To highlight the need for high-quality research addressing the optimal timing of IH repair in this vulnerable population.
- To inform the ongoing large, multicenter randomized trial investigating repair timing.
Main Methods:
- Review of single-institution studies on premature infants with intestinalхід (IH).
- Analysis of limitations in retrospective and small-cohort studies.
- Identification of calls for multicenter randomized trials.
Main Results:
- Existing studies suggest high risks for premature infants with IH.
- Outcomes may be influenced by the timing of surgical repair.
- There is a lack of high-quality, large-scale studies on this topic.
Conclusions:
- Optimal timing for intestinalхід (IH) repair in premature infants remains an understudied area.
- A significant need exists for multicenter randomized trials to establish best practices.
- An ongoing trial aims to provide crucial data on the safety and efficacy of early versus later IH repair.
Abstract:
This review shows that there are many single institution studies reviewing outcomes of premature infants with IH. However, the numbers of patients in these studies are often small and most studies were retrospective, therefore, these studies were subject to the limitations inherent to observational studies for identifying best treatment methods. Nevertheless, the studies show that risks are high in this population and that outcomes may vary with the timing of repair. There have been calls for multicentre randomised trials comparing early versus later IH repair from all over the world and for a very long time. Yet, despite the frequency of IH repair in premature infants, this issue remains unstudied in a high-quality manner. A large, multicentre randomised trial is currently underway to address the effect of timing on the short-term and long-term safety and efficacy of IH repair in this population so that we may be able to deliver safe surgical care to this vulnerable population.
