Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Manufacturing Abdominal Aorta Hydrogel Tissue-Mimicking Phantoms for Ultrasound Elastography Validation
Published on: September 19, 2018
A comparative study of strain and shear-wave elastography in an elasticity phantom
Jonathan F Carlsen1, Malene R Pedersen, Caroline Ewertsen
11 Department of Radiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
This study found that strain elastography methods, specifically strain ratio, were more accurate than shear-wave elastography for assessing target stiffness in phantoms. Both methods were impacted by target size, and shear-wave elastography accuracy was affected by depth.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Diagnostic Ultrasound
- Biophysics
Background:
- Elastography is a non-invasive ultrasound technique used to assess tissue stiffness.
- Strain elastography and shear-wave elastography are two primary methods with varying diagnostic accuracy.
- Understanding factors influencing elastography performance is crucial for clinical application.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of strain elastography (strain ratio, strain histogram) and shear-wave elastography (shear-wave velocity) in a phantom model.
- To investigate the impact of target diameter on elastographic assessments.
- To determine the effect of target depth on shear-wave elastography measurements.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a phantom with targets of varying stiffnesses (8-80 kPa) and diameters (2.5-16.7 mm).
- Performed 600 evaluations using shear-wave elastography, strain ratio, and strain histogram analysis with a linear-array transducer.
- Assessed the effect of depth (3.5 vs. 6 cm) on shear-wave elastography using a curved-array transducer.
- Employed mixed model analysis to evaluate the influence of target diameter and depth.
Main Results:
- Strain ratio and strain histogram analysis demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy (AUC) than shear-wave velocity when differentiating between distinct stiffness levels.
- All three elastography methods were significantly affected by target diameter (p=0.001).
- Target depth influenced shear-wave velocity measurements (p=0.001), while strain elastography methods were not significantly affected by depth in this study.
Conclusions:
- Diagnostic performance for differentiating target stiffness varies between strain and shear-wave elastography techniques.
- Target diameter is a critical factor influencing the accuracy of all evaluated elastography methods.
- Shear-wave elastography accuracy is demonstrably affected by target depth, necessitating careful consideration in clinical settings.
Related Concept Videos
Elastic Strain Energy for Shearing Stresses
Strain and Elastic Modulus
Elastic Strain Energy for Normal Stresses
If...
Measurements of Strain
Shearing Strain
Relation between Poisson's ratio, Modulus of Elasticity and Modulus of Rigidity

