Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Necessity of Morcellation at Time of Vaginal Hysterectomy.

Journal of minimally invasive gynecology·2016
Same author

Feasibility of Minimally Invasive Outpatient Hysterectomy.

Journal of minimally invasive gynecology·2016
Same author

Correlation between the extent of intraperitoneal disease and nodal metastasis in node-positive ovarian cancer patients.

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology·2014
Same author

Comparison of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopy for extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy.

Gynecologic oncology·2013
Same author

Defining the optimal lymphadenectomy cut-off value in epithelial ovarian cancer staging surgery utilizing a mathematical model of validation.

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology·2013
Same author

Location of aortic node metastases in locally advanced cervical cancer.

Gynecologic oncology·2012

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
12:10

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Published on: May 19, 2022

10.0K

Robotic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy.

J S Neto, D F Siufi, J F Magrina

    Minerva Ginecologica
    |February 26, 2015
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study details the robotic nerve-sparing technique for cervical cancer surgery. It shows this approach is feasible and preserves pelvic nerves, reducing complications.

    More Related Videos

    Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision
    07:22

    Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision

    Published on: June 13, 2025

    1.3K
    Robot-Assisted Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy Including Resection and Reconstruction of the Spleno-Mesenteric Junction
    12:34

    Robot-Assisted Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy Including Resection and Reconstruction of the Spleno-Mesenteric Junction

    Published on: January 3, 2020

    17.6K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Apr 16, 2026

    Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    12:10

    Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

    Published on: May 19, 2022

    10.0K
    Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision
    07:22

    Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision

    Published on: June 13, 2025

    1.3K
    Robot-Assisted Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy Including Resection and Reconstruction of the Spleno-Mesenteric Junction
    12:34

    Robot-Assisted Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy Including Resection and Reconstruction of the Spleno-Mesenteric Junction

    Published on: January 3, 2020

    17.6K

    Area of Science:

    • Gynecologic Oncology
    • Minimally Invasive Surgery
    • Robotic Surgery

    Background:

    • Cervical cancer treatment often involves radical hysterectomy.
    • Preservation of pelvic innervation is crucial for minimizing surgical sequelae.
    • Robotic surgery offers potential advantages in complex procedures.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To describe the robotic nerve-sparing technique for radical hysterectomy.
    • To review current literature on this surgical approach.
    • To evaluate the feasibility and benefits of robotic nerve-sparing surgery in cervical cancer.

    Main Methods:

    • Detailed presentation of anatomical considerations for nerve preservation.
    • Step-by-step description of the robotic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy procedure.
    • Review of recent scientific literature on the topic.

    Main Results:

    • Robotic-assisted nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy is feasible for cervical cancer.
    • Advantages include enhanced ergonomics, articulated movements, and magnified imaging.
    • These features aid in identifying and preserving pelvic nerves, reducing sequelae.

    Conclusions:

    • Robotic nerve-sparing technique is a viable option for cervical cancer treatment.
    • It can be integrated into standard care without compromising oncologic radicality.
    • This approach offers improved functional outcomes for patients.