Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 16, 2026
Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
Published on: August 4, 2023
Minimally Invasive Surgery for Osseointegrated Auditory Implants: A Comparison of Linear versus Punch Techniques
Steven A Gordon1, Daniel H Coelho2
1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Objectives:
(1) To describe the benefits of the minimally invasive punch technique without soft tissue reduction (PT) for the placement of percutaneous osseointegrated auditory implants. (2) To compare and contrast techniques and outcomes from PT with the linear technique with soft tissue reduction (LT).
Study Design:
Case series with chart review
Setting:
Performed at a tertiary otology practice at an academic medical center.
Subjects And Methods:
LT was used until 2012 when a switch was made for all patients to PT. Preoperative variables recorded included age, sex, BMI, smoking status, indication, device selected, and abutment length. Outcomes measures included surgical time, skin reaction grading by Holgers score at 1 week and at most recent follow-up, and any other complications. Two-sample t test and χ(2) was used to compare.
Results:
A total of 51 patients (34 LT, 17 PT) were identified. Surgical time was found to be significantly shorter for the PT group (LT, 49.2 min; PT, 13.4 min; P < .001). There were no statistically significant differences between LT and PT for mean Holgers at first (LT, 0.24; PT, 0.47; P = .87) or final follow-up (LT, 0.62; PT, 0.41; P = .22).
Conclusions:
The punch technique offers several potential surgical and cosmetic advantages over the linear technique without compromising skin-reactivity outcomes. This study supports a growing trend toward minimally invasive percutaneous auditory implant surgery.
