Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

10.5K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
10.5K
Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

20.6K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.6K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

3.5K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
3.5K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

97.6K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
97.6K
Ratio Level of Measurement00:54

Ratio Level of Measurement

19.6K
The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
A set of data measured using the ratio scale takes care of the ratio problem and provides complete information. Ratio scale data are like interval scale data, except they have a zero point and ratios can be calculated....
19.6K
Estimation of the Physical Quantities01:05

Estimation of the Physical Quantities

6.5K
On many occasions, physicists, other scientists, and engineers need to make estimates of a particular quantity. These are sometimes referred to as guesstimates, order-of-magnitude approximations, back-of-the-envelope calculations, or Fermi calculations. The physicist Enrico Fermi was famous for his ability to estimate various kinds of data with surprising precision. Estimating does not mean guessing a number or a formula at random. Instead, estimation means using prior experience and sound...
6.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Three steps toward dose optimization for oncology dose finding.

Contemporary clinical trials communications·2024
Same author

A gated group sequential design for seamless Phase II/III trial with subpopulation selection.

BMC medical research methodology·2023
Same author

A hybrid design for dose-finding oncology clinical trials.

International journal of cancer·2022
Same author

Mixture survival trees for cancer risk classification.

Lifetime data analysis·2022
Same author

Rejoinder to Letter to the Editor "The Hazards of Period Specific and Weighted Hazard Ratios".

Statistics in biopharmaceutical research·2021
Same author

Inferring latent heterogeneity using many feature variables supervised by survival outcome.

Statistics in medicine·2021
Same journal

Targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) in regulatory submissions and research: a landscape analysis.

The international journal of biostatistics·2026
Same journal

Predicting birth weight by multivariate functional principal component regressions.

The international journal of biostatistics·2026
Same journal

Robust median regression for count data with general lower truncation using a contaminated discrete Weibull model.

The international journal of biostatistics·2026
Same journal

Handling the uncertainty issue of missingness via a mixture-structure-based method.

The international journal of biostatistics·2026
Same journal

Statistical method for pooling categorical biomarker data from multi-center matched/nested case-control studies.

The international journal of biostatistics·2026
Same journal

Prognostic score methods for the estimation of the average causal effect.

The international journal of biostatistics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 23, 2025

Full- versus Sub-Regional Quantification of Amyloid-Beta Load on Mouse Brain Sections
07:28

Full- versus Sub-Regional Quantification of Amyloid-Beta Load on Mouse Brain Sections

Published on: May 19, 2022

4.2K

Quantifying an agreement study.

Jason J Z Liao

    The International Journal of Biostatistics
    |February 27, 2015
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study introduces two new rates, discordance rate and tolerance probability, to quantify measurement agreement. This method enhances the reliability assessment of clinical and experimental measurements in scientific research.

    More Related Videos

    Software-Assisted Quantitative Measurement of Osteoarthritic Subchondral Bone Thickness
    08:52

    Software-Assisted Quantitative Measurement of Osteoarthritic Subchondral Bone Thickness

    Published on: March 18, 2022

    3.2K
    A Protocol of Manual Tests to Measure Sensation and Pain in Humans
    07:28

    A Protocol of Manual Tests to Measure Sensation and Pain in Humans

    Published on: December 19, 2016

    21.2K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Oct 23, 2025

    Full- versus Sub-Regional Quantification of Amyloid-Beta Load on Mouse Brain Sections
    07:28

    Full- versus Sub-Regional Quantification of Amyloid-Beta Load on Mouse Brain Sections

    Published on: May 19, 2022

    4.2K
    Software-Assisted Quantitative Measurement of Osteoarthritic Subchondral Bone Thickness
    08:52

    Software-Assisted Quantitative Measurement of Osteoarthritic Subchondral Bone Thickness

    Published on: March 18, 2022

    3.2K
    A Protocol of Manual Tests to Measure Sensation and Pain in Humans
    07:28

    A Protocol of Manual Tests to Measure Sensation and Pain in Humans

    Published on: December 19, 2016

    21.2K

    Area of Science:

    • Medical and related sciences
    • Biostatistics
    • Clinical trial methodology

    Background:

    • Clinical and experimental measurements are crucial for evaluations in medical sciences.
    • Reliable measurements are essential for valid diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic assessments.
    • Existing methods for assessing measurement agreement lack quantification of agreement quality.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To propose a novel approach for quantifying the quality of agreement between two measurement methods.
    • To introduce the discordance rate and tolerance probability as key metrics for agreement assessment.
    • To provide a more rigorous evaluation of measurement reliability in scientific studies.

    Main Methods:

    • Development of two quantitative rates: discordance rate and tolerance probability.
    • Application of these rates to assess measurement agreement, analogous to Type I error and power in hypothesis testing.
    • Demonstration through practical examples.

    Main Results:

    • The proposed discordance rate and tolerance probability offer a quantifiable measure of agreement quality.
    • This approach provides a more nuanced understanding of measurement reliability beyond simple agreement.
    • The method is applicable to various scenarios, including randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and surrogate endpoint validation.

    Conclusions:

    • The discordance rate and tolerance probability are valuable metrics for assessing measurement agreement quality.
    • This quantification enhances the reliability of diagnostic, prognostic, and performance evaluations in medical research.
    • The proposed method addresses a gap in current statistical practices for evaluating measurement concordance.