Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

4.3K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
4.3K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

709
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
709
Statistical Significance01:37

Statistical Significance

24.5K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
24.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Community Optometrist-Led Monitoring of Quiescent Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: The FENETRE Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Early Versus Delayed Anticoagulation in Acute Ischemic Stroke According to Atrial Fibrillation Subtype and Time of Diagnosis: Subgroup Analysis of the OPTIMAS Randomized Controlled Trial.

Stroke·2026
Same author

Early versus delayed anticoagulation in acute ischemic stroke with atrial fibrillation according to infarct volume and location: A prespecified subgroup analysis of the OPTIMAS randomized controlled trial.

International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society·2026
Same author

Feasibility and reproducibility of handheld and table-mounted optical coherence tomography in children with craniosynostosis.

Eye (London, England)·2026
Same author

Visual Field Estimation in X-Linked Retinitis Pigmentosa Associated with Retinitis Pigmentosa GTPase Regulator (<i>RPGR</i>) from Image Analysis Using Artificial Intelligence.

Ophthalmology science·2026
Same author

Can provision of near vision glasses as an early intervention improve visual outcomes in infants at risk of perinatal brain insult? The Babies in Glasses (BiG) randomised feasibility trial.

BMJ open·2026
Same journal

Reference map of multimodal vision deficits in intermediate age-related macular degeneration: contrast sensitivity and low-contrast visual acuity.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Commentary on 'identifying patients with poor visual outcomes after primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery using machine learning'.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Automated deep learning-based retinoschisis and detachment volume measurement in pathological myopia with posterior scleral contraction.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Bacterial keratitis: a global review of current practices, challenges and innovations.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Real-world integration of an autonomous artificial intelligence system for diabetic retinopathy screening in an endocrinology outpatient clinic.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Maternal smoking during pregnancy: a risk factor for early childhood ophthalmologic conditions.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients
07:06

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients

Published on: March 29, 2022

3.5K

Ophthalmic statistics note 6: effect sizes matter

Jonathan A Cook1, Catey Bunce2, Caroline J Doré3

  • 1Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford, UK.

The British Journal of Ophthalmology
|February 28, 2015
PubMed
Summary

No abstract available in PubMed .

Keywords:
EpidemiologyMedical EducationPublic health

More Related Videos

Comparison of Three Clinical Stereoscopic Methods for Measuring Binocular Visual Function During Amblyopic Treatment in Unilateral Amblyopia
06:19

Comparison of Three Clinical Stereoscopic Methods for Measuring Binocular Visual Function During Amblyopic Treatment in Unilateral Amblyopia

Published on: September 27, 2024

657
Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

6.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients
07:06

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients

Published on: March 29, 2022

3.5K
Comparison of Three Clinical Stereoscopic Methods for Measuring Binocular Visual Function During Amblyopic Treatment in Unilateral Amblyopia
06:19

Comparison of Three Clinical Stereoscopic Methods for Measuring Binocular Visual Function During Amblyopic Treatment in Unilateral Amblyopia

Published on: September 27, 2024

657
Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

6.9K