Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 16, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Baseline Attitudes About Prostate Cancer Screening Moderate the Impact of Decision Aids on Screening Rates
Amy J Starosta1, George Luta, Catherine A Tomko
1Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
Background:
The impact of decision aids on prostate cancer screening outcomes has been inconsistent.
Purpose:
We assessed whether pre-existing attitudes moderated the impact of decision aids on screening.
Methods:
Men aged 45-70 (56.2% Caucasian, 39.9% African-American) were randomly assigned to a print decision aid (N = 630), a web decision aid (N = 631), or usual care (N = 632). Telephone interviews assessed pro/con screening attitudes and screening behaviors at baseline, 1-month and 13-months post-randomization.
Results:
Logistic regression analyses revealed significant arm by attitude interactions: Higher baseline cons scores predicted lower screening in the print (OR = 0.60 (95% CI: 0.40, 0.92)) and web (OR = 0.61 (95% CI: 0.40, 0.91)) arms but not in usual care (OR = 1.34 (95% CI: 0.90, 2.00)).
Conclusions:
The decision aids amplified the impact of men's baseline attitudes about limitations of screening: Compared to the usual care arm, men in both decision aid arms were less likely to be screened when they perceived more limitations of screening.
Related Concept Videos
Halo Effect
Surveys
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Preventive Healthcare Services
Disorders of the Male Reproductive System
Prostate disorders are another major concern. These conditions can impair urinary flow due to the prostate's location around the urethra....
Cancer Prevention
