Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Forces01:09

Types of Forces

16.9K
In most situations, forces can be grouped into two categories: contact forces and field forces.  Contact forces occur as a result of direct physical contact between objects. Field forces, however, act without the necessity of physical contact between objects. They depend on the presence of a "field" in the region of space surrounding the body under consideration. You can think of a field as a property of space that is detectable by the forces it exerts. Scientists think there...
16.9K
Force and Potential Energy in Three Dimensions01:04

Force and Potential Energy in Three Dimensions

5.8K
Consider a particle moving under the action of a conservative force that has components along each coordinate axis. Each component of force is a function of the coordinates. The potential energy function U is also a function of all three spatial coordinates. Force in one dimension can be written as the negative ratio of potential energy change to the displacement along that coordinate. For minimal displacement, the ratios become derivatives. If a function has many variables, the derivative only...
5.8K
Force and Potential Energy in One Dimension01:13

Force and Potential Energy in One Dimension

6.6K
Force can be calculated from the expression for potential energy, which is a function of position. The component of a conservative force, in a particular direction, equals the negative of the derivative of the corresponding potential energy with respect to the displacement in that direction. For regions where potential energy changes rapidly with displacement, the work done and force is maximum. Also, when force is applied along the positive coordinate axis, the potential energy decreases with...
6.6K
Force01:06

Force

34.7K
Forces affect every moment of our life. Our bodies are held to the Earth by force, and they are held together by the forces of charged particles. When we open a door, walk down a street, lift a fork, or touch a baby's face, we are applying force. Our body's atoms are held together by electrical forces, and the core of an atom, called the nucleus, is held together by the strongest force known to us—nuclear force.
The study of motion is called kinematics, but kinematics only...
34.7K
Two-Dimensional Force System01:20

Two-Dimensional Force System

1.8K
A two-dimensional system in mechanical engineering involves the analysis of motion and forces in a plane. A two-dimensional force vector can be resolved into its components as:
1.8K
Three-Dimensional Force System01:30

Three-Dimensional Force System

3.1K
In mechanical engineering, a three-dimensional force system is a system of forces acting in three dimensions, with forces applied along the x, y, and z coordinate axes. The three-dimensional force system is an important concept in mechanical engineering, as it allows engineers to understand and analyze the behavior of objects and structures in three dimensions. By understanding the forces acting on a system, engineers can design more efficient and effective mechanical systems that can withstand...
3.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

DeepQMC: An open-source software suite for variational optimization of deep-learning molecular wave functions.

The Journal of chemical physics·2023
Same author

Electronic excited states in deep variational Monte Carlo.

Nature communications·2023
Same author

Convergence to the fixed-node limit in deep variational Monte Carlo.

The Journal of chemical physics·2021
Same author

Path probability ratios for Langevin dynamics-Exact and approximate.

The Journal of chemical physics·2021
Same author

Collective hydrogen-bond rearrangement dynamics in liquid water.

The Journal of chemical physics·2019
Same author

Voluntary and electrically-induced muscle fatigue differently affect postural control mechanisms in unipedal stance.

Experimental brain research·2018
Same journal

Metastable excited states of iodide-alkyl halide cluster anions: Insights from photodetachment spectroscopy and non-Hermitian quantum chemistry.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Pressure-induced thermal expansion anomalies in dhcp iron hydride associated with magnetoelastic coupling.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Seniority eigenstate configuration interaction.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

A data-driven modeling study on the accurate identification of Doppler-free saturated absorption spectra in diatomic tellurium (130Te2).

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Anharmonic phonons via quantum thermal bath simulations.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Quantum simulation of alignment dependent differential cross sections in co-propagating molecular beams at cold collision energies.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Cell Membrane Biophysics - Exploring Interactions and Challenges Through Experimental and Computational Approaches
07:31

Author Spotlight: Advancing Cell Membrane Biophysics - Exploring Interactions and Challenges Through Experimental and Computational Approaches

Published on: September 1, 2023

3.5K

Dynamic properties of force fields.

F Vitalini1, A S J S Mey1, F Noé1

  • 1Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Freie Universität Berlin, Arnimallee 6, D-14195 Berlin, Germany.

The Journal of Chemical Physics
|March 2, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Different molecular dynamics force fields significantly alter peptide dynamics predictions. This impacts the reliability of simulations for understanding biological system behavior and conformational changes.

More Related Videos

Finite Element Modelling of a Cellular Electric Microenvironment
08:23

Finite Element Modelling of a Cellular Electric Microenvironment

Published on: May 18, 2021

4.1K
Measurement of Force-Sensitive Protein Dynamics in Living Cells Using a Combination of Fluorescent Techniques
08:28

Measurement of Force-Sensitive Protein Dynamics in Living Cells Using a Combination of Fluorescent Techniques

Published on: November 2, 2018

8.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Cell Membrane Biophysics - Exploring Interactions and Challenges Through Experimental and Computational Approaches
07:31

Author Spotlight: Advancing Cell Membrane Biophysics - Exploring Interactions and Challenges Through Experimental and Computational Approaches

Published on: September 1, 2023

3.5K
Finite Element Modelling of a Cellular Electric Microenvironment
08:23

Finite Element Modelling of a Cellular Electric Microenvironment

Published on: May 18, 2021

4.1K
Measurement of Force-Sensitive Protein Dynamics in Living Cells Using a Combination of Fluorescent Techniques
08:28

Measurement of Force-Sensitive Protein Dynamics in Living Cells Using a Combination of Fluorescent Techniques

Published on: November 2, 2018

8.9K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Chemistry
  • Biophysics
  • Molecular Modeling

Background:

  • Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are crucial for studying biological system dynamics.
  • Accurate prediction of relaxation timescales and conformational exchange is vital for MD force fields.
  • Assessing force field performance in capturing these dynamic properties is essential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate how different molecular dynamics force fields affect the predicted dynamic properties of model peptides.
  • To compare relaxation timescales and conformational exchange processes across various force fields.

Main Methods:

  • Simulated four model peptides (Ac-A-NHMe, Ac-V-NHMe, AVAVA, A10) using five distinct force fields (AMBER ff99SB-ILDN, AMBER ff03, OPLS-AA/L, CHARMM27, GROMOS43a1).
  • Employed Markov state models to extract dynamic properties from simulation trajectories.
  • Analyzed differences in relaxation timescales and conformational exchange mechanisms.

Main Results:

  • For single-residue models, conformational exchange was similar across force fields, but relaxation timescales varied up to tenfold.
  • For longer peptide systems, both relaxation timescales and conformational exchange processes showed considerable divergence among force fields.
  • Discrepancies highlight potential limitations in interpreting MD simulation dynamics.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of molecular dynamics force field significantly influences the predicted dynamic behavior of peptides.
  • Differences in predicted relaxation timescales and conformational exchange processes question the universal applicability of current force fields for dynamic studies.
  • Further investigation is needed to ensure the reliability of MD simulations for biological system dynamics.