Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 16, 2026

06:43
High Frequency Ultrasound for the Analysis of Fetal and Placental Development In Vivo
Published on: November 8, 2018
11.1K
Ultrasonographic Fetal Weight Estimation: Should Macrosomia-Specific Formulas Be Utilized?
Blake Porter1, Cherry Neely2, Jeff Szychowski2
1Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Missouri, Kansas City, Missouri.
American Journal of Perinatology
|March 3, 2015
Summary
A new formula for estimated fetal weight (EFW) in macrosomic fetuses (≥4kg) is more accurate than the Hadlock IV formula. Maternal diabetes did not improve EFW estimation accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Fetal Medicine
- Maternal-Fetal Medicine
Background:
- Accurate estimation of fetal weight (EFW) is crucial for managing pregnancies, particularly those with suspected fetal macrosomia.
- Existing formulas, like Hadlock IV, may have limitations in accurately estimating the weight of macrosomic fetuses (birth weight ≥ 4 kg).
Purpose of the Study:
- To derive and validate a new EFW formula specifically for macrosomic fetuses.
- To compare the accuracy of the new macrosomic formula against the Hadlock IV formula.
- To determine if incorporating maternal diabetes mellitus (MDM) status improves EFW estimation in macrosomic fetuses.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 403 nonanomalous singleton pregnancies with birth weight ≥ 4 kg and biometric data within 14 days of birth.
- Development of a macrosomic-specific EFW formula using multivariable linear regression on a training dataset.
- Validation of the formula using a separate validation dataset and comparison of accuracy metrics (ME, AME, MPE) with the Hadlock IV formula.
- Development and evaluation of diabetes-specific formulas to assess their impact on accuracy.
Main Results:
- The derived macrosomic formula demonstrated significantly lower mean error (ME), absolute mean error (AME), and mean percent error (MPE) compared to the Hadlock IV formula in both training and validation datasets.
- The Hadlock IV formula systematically underestimated fetal birth weight in this cohort.
- EFW formulas specifically for maternal diabetes did not show improved accuracy compared to the general macrosomic formula.
Conclusions:
- A dedicated EFW formula for macrosomic fetuses significantly outperforms the Hadlock IV formula, which tends to underestimate fetal weight.
- Maternal diabetes status does not enhance the accuracy of EFW estimation in macrosomic fetuses when using specific formulas.
- Clinicians should consider using a macrosomic-specific EFW formula when fetal macrosomia is suspected to improve weight estimation accuracy.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Dosing: Obese Patients
349
In the United States, obesity is a prominent concern. It is linked to heightened mortality rates due to increased occurrences of conditions such as hypertension, atherosclerosis, coronary artery disease, and diabetes compared to nonobese individuals. A patient is classified as obese if their actual body weight surpasses the ideal or desirable body weight by 20%, based on Metropolitan Life Insurance Company data. Ideal body weights consider average weights and heights for males and females...
349
z Scores and Area Under the Curve
20.3K
z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of...
20.3K
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine Concentration
323
Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) can be estimated from serum creatinine using the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula or the chronic kidney disease–epidemiology collaboration (CKD–EPI) equation. Both methods are widely used in clinical practice to assess kidney function and guide treatment decisions.The MDRD equation does not require weight or height measurements and is normalized to the body surface area of 1.73 m², considered the average adult surface area.
323

