Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
Different personal propensities among scientists relate to deeper vs. broader knowledge contributions
Thomas S Bateman1, Andrew M Hess2
1McIntire School of Commerce, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904; and tsb3c@virginia.edu.
Scientists' personal traits influence research depth and breadth. Competitiveness drives depth, while conscientiousness and learning goals favor breadth, impacting scientific knowledge contributions.
Area of Science:
- Psychology of Science
- Bibliometrics
- Research Impact
Background:
- Scientific contributions can be characterized by depth (specialized knowledge) and breadth (interdisciplinary scope).
- Understanding the link between scientists' personal dispositions and their publication patterns is crucial for advancing scientific knowledge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how individual scientists' personal dispositions predict the depth versus breadth of their published research contributions.
- To test the hypothesis that broader studies are perceived as riskier and less attractive than deeper studies.
Main Methods:
- Study 1: Survey assessing scientists' perceptions of hypothetical deeper versus broader research studies.
- Study 2: Correlating questionnaire measures of medical researchers' dispositions with bibliometric data on their publication's topical coverage over 10 years.
Main Results:
- Competitiveness positively predicted research depth; conscientiousness negatively predicted breadth.
- Learning goal orientation predicted breadth, while performance goal orientation predicted depth.
- Openness to experience positively influenced both depth and breadth; exploratory work behavior favored breadth over depth.
Conclusions:
- Personal dispositions significantly and differentially shape the depth and breadth of scientific contributions.
- This research provides a nuanced understanding of how individual traits influence the landscape of scientific knowledge production.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Implicit Personality Theories
Fundamental Attribution Error
Biological Influences on Intelligence
Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity
Environmental Influences on Intelligence
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

