Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

4.8K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
4.8K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

725
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
725
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

398
Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
398
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.4K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.4K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

580
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
580
Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

687
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different...
687

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Novel Therapeutic Mechanism for Nicotine Craving in Schizophrenia.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Smoking cessation for people with severe mental illness: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BMJ medicine·2026
Same author

Impulsivity-related predictors of adolescent substance use initiation.

Psychological medicine·2026
Same author

Detection of Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Impairment Using Resting-State Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Electrographic cue-reactivity co-localizes with accumbens deep brain stimulation in a case of opioid use disorder.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Neurocognitive outcomes in adolescents with and without four weeks of cannabis abstinence: a randomized clinical trial using contingency management.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.5K

Detecting treatment-covariate interactions using permutation methods.

Rui Wang1, David A Schoenfeld, Bettina Hoeppner

  • 1Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 221 Longwood Avenue, MA 02115, Boston, U.S.A.; Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, 655 Huntington Avenue, Boston, 02115, MA, U.S.A.

Statistics in Medicine
|March 5, 2015
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new permutation test to detect if treatment effects differ among patient groups in clinical trials. This method efficiently analyzes multiple patient characteristics simultaneously, improving personalized treatment strategies.

Keywords:
interactionsmultiple covariatespermutation methodssubgroup analysisvariable selection

More Related Videos

Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice
07:38

Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice

Published on: September 20, 2024

2.8K
A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
10:46

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data

Published on: December 9, 2015

11.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.5K
Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice
07:38

Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice

Published on: September 20, 2024

2.8K
A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
10:46

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data

Published on: December 9, 2015

11.2K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trials
  • Medical Research

Background:

  • Randomized clinical trials typically assess average treatment effects.
  • Treatment effectiveness can vary significantly across patient subpopulations.
  • Existing methods for detecting treatment heterogeneity often examine covariates individually, limiting comprehensive analysis and increasing false positive risks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel permutation test for detecting treatment effect heterogeneity across multiple covariates simultaneously.
  • To provide an integrated approach for identifying personalized treatment strategies in randomized clinical trials.
  • To offer an alternative to standard methods, particularly beneficial when dealing with a large number of covariates.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a new permutation test for the null hypothesis of no interaction effects for any covariate.
  • The proposed test allows simultaneous consideration of multiple covariates without pre-specifying patient subgroups.
  • Application of the method to randomized clinical trials involving multiple treatments.

Main Results:

  • The new permutation test effectively assesses treatment effect heterogeneity across numerous covariates simultaneously.
  • It offers an advantage over traditional methods like the likelihood ratio test when covariate numbers are large.
  • Demonstrated utility using data from the Treatment of Adolescents with Depression Study.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed permutation test is a valuable tool for identifying personalized treatment strategies by analyzing complex interactions.
  • It addresses limitations of existing methods by incorporating multiple covariates efficiently and reducing false positive rates.
  • This approach enhances the ability to determine the most appropriate treatment for specific patient groups in clinical research.