The HEART Pathway randomized trial: identifying emergency department patients with acute chest pain for early

Simon A Mahler1, Robert F Riley2, Brian C Hiestand2

  • 1From the Department of Emergency Medicine (S.A.M., B.C.H., J.W.H., C.W.L., B.A.N., D.M.C., K.L.A., S.B.E., C.D.M.), Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine (R.F.R., D.M.H.), Department of Biostatistical Sciences (G.B.R.), and Division of Public Health Sciences (G.L.B.), Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC. smahler@wakehealth.edu.

Insights

The HEART Pathway (Heart Disease Risk Prediction Approach) safely reduces cardiac testing and hospital stays for emergency department patients with chest pain, increasing early discharges without compromising safety.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Clinical Decision Support

Background:

  • The HEART Pathway is a validated decision aid for identifying emergency department patients with acute chest pain suitable for early discharge.
  • No prior randomized trials have compared the HEART Pathway's effectiveness against usual care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of the HEART Pathway compared to usual care in managing adult emergency department patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome without ST-elevation on ECG.
  • To assess the impact of the HEART Pathway on objective cardiac testing, length of stay, early discharge rates, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

Main Methods:

  • A randomized trial involving 282 adult patients with acute coronary syndrome symptoms (without ST-elevation).
  • Patients were randomized to either the HEART Pathway (utilizing HEART score and serial troponin measurements) or usual care (based on ACC/AHA guidelines).
  • Outcomes, including objective cardiac testing, length of stay, early discharge, and 30-day MACE, were assessed via phone interviews and record review.

Main Results:

  • The HEART Pathway group showed a significant reduction in objective cardiac testing (12.1% decrease, P=0.048) and length of stay (12 hours shorter, P=0.013) compared to usual care.
  • Early discharge rates were significantly higher in the HEART Pathway group (21.3% increase, P<0.001).
  • No patients identified for early discharge experienced major adverse cardiac events within 30 days.

Conclusions:

  • The HEART Pathway effectively reduces objective cardiac testing and length of hospital stay while increasing early discharges for selected emergency department patients.
  • These efficiency improvements were achieved without an increase in 30-day major adverse cardiac events for patients discharged early.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos