Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
Long term results and predictors of left ventricular function recovery after aortic valve replacement for chronic
Hiroyuki Saisho1, Koichi Arinaga, Satoshi Kikusaki
1Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan.
Objectives:
In most patients with aortic regurgitation (AR), aortic valve replacement (AVR) improves left ventricular (LV) function, but some patients will not have favorable remodeling. Our objectives were to review long term clinical results of AVR for AR and to examine what factors affect the normalization of LV function after AVR for chronic AR.
Methods:
Between 1989 and 2010, 177 patients underwent isolated AVR for chronic pure AR. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on indexed end-systolic LV diameter (iESD): Group L (iESD) ≥25 mm/m(2)) (130 patients) and Group S (iESD <25 mm/m(2)) (47 patients).
Results:
There was no significant difference between groups in late mortality, freedom from cardiac-related death and rehospitalization for heart failure at late follow up after operation. At postoperative follow-up, 16% of patients had not recovered normal LV systolic function. By means of multivariate analysis, iESD and cardiac index (CI) were independent predictors of recovery of LV function and iESD >26.7 mm/m(2) and CI <2.71 l/min/m(2) were the best cut-off values.
Conclusions:
Early and late surgical results of AVR for chronic AR were good, but for the preservation of postoperative normal LV function, AVR for AR patients should be performed before iESD reaches 26.7 mm/m(2).
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management

