Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Case Studies01:22

Case Studies

13.9K
There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.
13.9K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

579
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
579
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

1.1K
The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic...
1.1K
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II01:25

Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II

4.3K
Nursing diagnoses represent a problem validated by major defining characteristics. There are four categories of nursing diagnoses: problem-focused, risk, health promotion or wellness, and syndrome. The anatomy of a nursing diagnosis includes three components: problem statement or diagnostic label, defining characteristics, and related factors.
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...
4.3K
Longitudinal Research02:20

Longitudinal Research

13.7K
Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
13.7K
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis I01:26

Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis I

4.4K
A nursing diagnosis is written when the nurse recognizes a cluster of essential patient data indicating health problems treated with independent nursing interventions. The standardized terminologies of a nursing diagnosis help nurses identify and treat patients' problems. Every electronic health record that uses nursing diagnosis must employ standard diagnostic terminology. Developing an efficient, individualized care plan begins with accurate nursing diagnoses.
There are thirteen domains...
4.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Risk of Adverse Birth Outcomes and Birth Defects Among Women Living With HIV on Antiretroviral Therapy and HIV-Negative Women in Uganda, 2015-2021.

Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)·2025
Same author

Population-Based Estimates for the Prevalence of Multiple Sclerosis in the United States by Race, Ethnicity, Age, Sex, and Geographic Region.

JAMA neurology·2023
Same author

Survival and epidemiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) cases in the Chicago and Detroit metropolitan cohort: incident cases 2009-2011 and survival through 2018.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration·2022
Same author

Analysis of Biospecimen Demand and Utilization of Samples from the National Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Biorepository.

Biopreservation and biobanking·2021
Same author

Keratinous biomarker of mercury exposure associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis risk in a nationwide U.S. study.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration·2020
Same author

Feasibility of Using a Nationally Representative Telephone Survey to Monitor Multiple Sclerosis Prevalence in the United States.

Neuroepidemiology·2020
Same journal

Delay in the Provision of Antiretroviral Therapy to HIV-infected TB Patients in Nigeria.

Universal journal of public health·2018
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 16, 2026

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
10:46

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data

Published on: December 9, 2015

11.2K

Improving a Case-Control Study of Multiple Sclerosis Using Formative Research.

Dhelia M Williamson1, Laurie Wagner2, Judy P Henry3

  • 1Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, 30333, United States.

Universal Journal of Public Health
|March 6, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Formative research improved a multiple sclerosis (MS) case-control study by identifying participant needs. Neurologist communication and clear genetic results reporting enhanced recruitment and retention strategies.

Keywords:
Case-Control StudyEnvironmental Risk FactorsFormative ResearchGenetic SusceptibilityMultiple Sclerosis

More Related Videos

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

13.7K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 16, 2026

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
10:46

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data

Published on: December 9, 2015

11.2K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

13.7K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

8.2K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Multiple sclerosis (MS) risk is influenced by environmental exposures and genetic susceptibility.
  • Case-control studies are crucial for investigating these risk factors.
  • Understanding participant perceptions is key to successful epidemiological research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct formative research for a case-control study on MS risk factors.
  • To identify participant risk perceptions and barriers to study engagement.
  • To refine study materials and processes based on participant feedback.

Main Methods:

  • Focus groups and key informant interviews were employed.
  • Participants reviewed and commented on study protocols, including interview, genetic testing, and confidentiality procedures.
  • A structured discussion guide ensured comprehensive topic coverage.

Main Results:

  • Participants preferred study information from neurologists over government agencies.
  • Willingness to provide blood samples for genotyping was high, but preferences for blood draw setting varied.
  • Concerns were raised regarding the receipt of individual genotyping results.

Conclusions:

  • Formative research effectively identified and addressed barriers to participation in epidemiological studies.
  • Modifications to study materials based on participant input can enhance engagement and retention.
  • Neurologist endorsement and clear communication about genetic results are vital for participant trust and adherence.