Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Cochlea01:13

The Cochlea

52.7K
The cochlea is a coiled structure in the inner ear that contains hair cells—the sensory receptors of the auditory system. Sound waves are transmitted to the cochlea by small bones attached to the eardrum called the ossicles, which vibrate the oval window that leads to the inner ear. This causes fluid in the chambers of the cochlea to move, vibrating the basilar membrane.
52.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of Talker Sex Differences on Binaural Summation in Cochlear Implant Users and Normal Hearing Listeners.

Trends in hearing·2026
Same author

Binaural Processing Is Key to Tonal-Language Benefits and Right-Ear Advantage for Segregation of Competing Speech.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2026
Same author

Factors affecting binaural fusion in cochlear implant users.

Hearing research·2026
Same author

Implicit and Explicit Voice Training Effects on Speech-on-Speech Perception and Listening Effort.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same author

Targeted inner ear delivery of gadolinium using microbubble-assisted ultrasound in an ovine model.

International journal of pharmaceutics·2026
Same author

Music Ensemble: a large dataset on musicianship, cognition, and personality in musicians and nonmusicians.

Scientific data·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
06:54

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.0K

Modulation frequency discrimination with single and multiple channels in cochlear implant users.

John J Galvin1, Sandy Oba2, Deniz Başkent3

  • 1Division of Communication and Auditory Neuroscience, House Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Research School of Behavioral and Cognitive Neurosciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Hearing Research
|March 10, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Cochlear implant (CI) users showed no difference in amplitude modulation frequency discrimination (AMFD) between single and multiple channels when loudness was similar. However, multi-channel stimulation significantly improved AMFD when loudness was higher, suggesting loudness summation plays a key role.

More Related Videos

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach
10:50

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach

Published on: June 6, 2012

15.0K
Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

951

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
06:54

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.0K
Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach
10:50

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach

Published on: June 6, 2012

15.0K
Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

951

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Cochlear Implant Technology
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • Temporal envelope cues are crucial for speech understanding in cochlear implant (CI) users.
  • Previous research indicates multi-channel processing of temporal envelopes benefits amplitude modulation frequency discrimination (AMFD) in CI users.
  • The role of loudness summation versus distributed neural stimulation in this multi-channel advantage remains unclear due to clinical fitting practices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether the multi-channel advantage in AMFD for CI users is attributable to loudness summation or to the distribution of envelope information across neural populations.
  • To compare single- and multi-channel AMFD thresholds under conditions of similar loudness and different loudness levels.

Main Methods:

  • Amplitude modulation frequency discrimination (AMFD) thresholds were measured in CI users using single- and multi-channel stimulation.
  • Multi-channel stimulation involved varying electrode spacing to alter neural population overlap.
  • Experiments were conducted at similar perceived loudness (Experiment 1) and at summation-adjusted current levels (Experiment 2) with coherent modulation across channels.

Main Results:

  • No significant difference in AMFD thresholds was found between single- and multi-channel stimuli when loudness levels were matched.
  • When using summation-adjusted current levels (resulting in lower single-channel loudness), AMFD thresholds were significantly better for multi-channel stimulation compared to single-channel stimulation.
  • Electrode spacing did not significantly affect multi-channel AMFD thresholds, indicating the distribution of neural stimulation was less critical than overall loudness.

Conclusions:

  • Increased loudness resulting from multi-channel summation appears to be a significant factor contributing to the observed multi-channel advantage in AMFD for CI users.
  • Overall loudness may be more critical for AMFD performance than the precise distribution of temporal envelope information across the cochlea.
  • These findings have implications for optimizing CI speech processing strategies to enhance speech perception through improved temporal envelope coding.