Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 16, 2026

COVID-19 Seroprevalence Test for IgG Antibody Levels Among Healthy Donors Across Different Pandemic Phases in Jeddah
Published on: June 24, 2025
Vaccine coverage estimation using a computerized vaccination registry with potential underreporting and a
Lina Pérez Breva1, Javier Díez Domingo1, Miguel Ángel Martínez Beneito2
1Vaccine Research, Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research in the Valencian Region FISABIO - Public Health, Avenida Cataluña 21, CP 46020 Valencia, Spain.
This study developed a Bayesian method to accurately estimate meningococcal C conjugate vaccine (MCCV) coverage by combining registry data with seroprevalence. The findings reveal significant underreporting in vaccine registries, especially during catch-up campaigns.
Area of Science:
- Epidemiology
- Biostatistics
- Vaccinology
Background:
- Computerized vaccine registries are crucial for monitoring immunization programs.
- Underreporting in registries can lead to inaccurate vaccine coverage estimates.
- Seroprevalence studies offer an alternative measure of population immunity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and illustrate a novel method for estimating vaccine coverage using both registry data and seroprevalence.
- To quantify the underreporting rate in a vaccine registry for meningococcal C conjugate vaccine (MCCV).
- To assess MCCV uptake in different age groups.
Main Methods:
- A Bayesian model was developed to integrate data from a vaccine registry (SIV) and a seroprevalence study.
- 1430 subjects aged 3-29 years were analyzed for MCCV status and seroprotection levels.
- Subjects with unregistered MCCV were categorized based on other vaccine records.
Main Results:
- Seroprotection levels were similar between registered and unregistered MCCV subjects, indicating substantial underreporting.
- Estimated MCCV coverage exceeded 80% in most age groups, but was 67.6% for those >22 years.
- Underreporting rates varied by age group, ranging from 23.5% to 73.4% for the 2002 catch-up campaign.
Conclusions:
- The Bayesian model provides a more accurate estimation of vaccine uptake compared to registry data alone.
- The study quantified significant underreporting in the SIV registry, particularly for vaccinations during the 2002 catch-up campaign.
- This methodology is valuable for improving vaccine coverage assessments and understanding registry limitations.
Related Concept Videos
Vaccinations
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Prevalence and Incidence
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health...
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Principles of Disease Surveillance

