Effect of surgical experience on the macroscopic diagnosis of appendicitis: a retrospective cohort study

Helen Pham1, Michael Devadas1, Julie Howle1

  • 1Department of Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Corner of Darcy and Hawkesbury Rd, Westmead, NSW, Australia.

Abstract

Insights

Surgical experience does not impact the accuracy of intraoperative appendix assessment. Appendicectomy should be performed based on clinical indication, not just visual inspection, as sex influences false negative rates.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical pathology
  • Clinical diagnostics

Background:

  • Intraoperative macroscopic assessment of the appendix is a key diagnostic step.
  • Understanding factors influencing diagnostic accuracy, such as surgeon experience and patient sex, is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate if surgical experience enhances intraoperative appendix assessment accuracy.
  • To determine if patient sex affects the accuracy of intraoperative appendix evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 303 appendicectomy cases from 2011-2012 at Westmead Hospital.
  • Comparison of intraoperative macroscopic descriptions against histopathology findings.
  • Analysis of accuracy based on surgeon's training level and patient sex.

Main Results:

  • Overall correlation between intraoperative diagnosis and histopathology was 83.5%.
  • Diagnostic accuracy did not significantly differ among junior trainees, senior trainees, and consultants (P = 0.44).
  • The false negative rate for appendix assessment was significantly higher in females (19.1%) compared to males (7.2%; P = 0.007).

Conclusions:

  • Surgeon experience does not influence the accuracy of intraoperative appendix assessment.
  • Clinical indication should guide appendicectomy decisions, irrespective of macroscopic findings.
  • Sex is a significant factor affecting the accuracy of intraoperative appendix evaluation, with higher false negatives in females.