Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish
Published on: July 18, 2020
Using latent class analysis to identify academic and behavioral risk status in elementary students.
Kathleen R King1, Erica S Lembke2, Wendy M Reinke3
1Department of Psychology, East Carolina University.
This study identified three distinct classes of third-grade students based on academic and behavioral risk. These classes, identified through screening, predict future academic success and inform intervention resource allocation in educational support models.
Area of Science:
- Educational Psychology
- Developmental Psychology
- Applied Behavior Analysis
Background:
- Response to Intervention (RTI) and Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) models require effective resource allocation for student interventions.
- Identifying distinct student profiles based on academic and behavioral risk is crucial for targeted support.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify latent classes of third-grade students based on academic and behavioral risk indicators.
- To determine if these identified classes predict end-of-year academic achievement.
- To inform the allocation of intervention resources within RTI and MTSS frameworks.
Main Methods:
- Latent Class Analysis (LCA) was performed on a sample of 517 third-grade students.
- Fall screening data in reading, mathematics, and behavior were utilized as indicators.
- Predictive validity was assessed against end-of-year statewide achievement test scores.
Main Results:
- Three distinct subclasses were identified: Tier 1 (minimal concerns, 32%), Tier 2 (academic risk, some behavior risk, 37%), and Tier 3 (significant academic and behavior problems, 31%).
- All identified classes were predictive of end-of-year statewide achievement test performance.
- A significant performance hierarchy was observed: Tier 1 > Tier 2 > Tier 3.
Conclusions:
- Brief screening measures can effectively identify distinct student classes with varying academic and behavioral risk levels.
- These identified classes demonstrate predictive power for later academic success.
- Findings support differentiated intervention strategies and resource allocation for students at risk of academic failure and behavioral issues.
More Related Videos
12:55Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
09:00Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
Published on: August 16, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Conduct Disorder
Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
Group Design
Reliability and Validity
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....