Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Odds Ratio01:09

Odds Ratio

2.4K
The odds ratio (OR) is a statistical measure used extensively in epidemiology and research to quantify the strength of association between exposure and outcome across different groups. Unlike relative risk, which compares the probabilities of an event occurring, the odds ratio compares the odds of an event occurring in the exposed group to the odds of it occurring in the unexposed group. The odds, in this context, are calculated as the probability of the event happening divided by the...
2.4K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

579
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
579
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

737
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
737
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

2.6K
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
2.6K
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

1.3K
Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
1.3K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

725
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
725

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Modulation of mGlu5 reduces rewarding associative properties of nicotine via changes in mesolimbic plasticity: Relevance to comorbid cigarette smoking in psychosis.

Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior·2024
Same author

Development of character strengths across the deployment cycle among U.S. Army soldiers.

Journal of personality·2020
Same author

Point-biserial correlation: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, meta-analysis, and sample size determination.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2019
Same author

Interval estimation for linear functions of medians in within-subjects and mixed designs.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2019
Same author

CFA with binary variables in small samples: a comparison of two methods.

Frontiers in psychology·2015
Same author

Meta-analysis methods for risk differences.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2013

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.4K

Varying coefficient meta-analysis methods for odds ratios and risk ratios.

Douglas G Bonett1, Robert M Price2

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz.

Psychological Methods
|March 10, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

New meta-analysis methods offer improved ways to combine and compare odds ratios and risk ratios across studies. These varying coefficient methods provide robust alternatives to traditional fixed-effect and random-effects approaches.

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.4K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.8K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Medical Research Methodology

Background:

  • Effect size measures like odds ratios and risk ratios are crucial for dichotomous outcomes in 2-group studies.
  • Existing meta-analysis methods, such as fixed-effect and random-effects models, have limitations regarding effect-size homogeneity and distributional assumptions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose novel confidence interval methods for combining and comparing odds ratios and risk ratios in multistudy designs.
  • To introduce varying coefficient methods as an alternative to traditional meta-analysis techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Development of confidence interval methods for varying coefficient models.
  • Application of these methods to combine and compare odds ratios and risk ratios across multiple studies.
  • Extensive simulation studies to evaluate performance characteristics.

Main Results:

  • The proposed varying coefficient methods do not necessitate effect-size homogeneity.
  • These methods do not assume that study effect sizes are drawn from a normally distributed superpopulation.
  • Simulation studies indicate excellent performance under realistic conditions.

Conclusions:

  • Varying coefficient methods offer a valuable alternative to current meta-analysis techniques for combining and comparing odds ratios and risk ratios.
  • These novel methods enhance the flexibility and applicability of meta-analysis in diverse research settings.
  • The proposed approaches are robust and perform well in practical scenarios.