Relationship between daily exposure to biomass fuel smoke and blood pressure in high-altitude Peru
Melissa Burroughs Peña1, Karina M Romero1, Eric J Velazquez1
1From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC (M.B.P., E.J.V.); Biomedical Research Unit, A.B. PRISMA, Lima, Peru (K.M.R.); Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO (V.G.D.-R.); Program in Global Disease Epidemiology and Control, Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health (R.H.G.) and Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine (R.A.W., W.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; and CRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases (R.H.G., J.J.M., W.C.) and Department of Medicine (J.J.M.), Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Abstract:
Household air pollution from biomass fuel use affects 3 billion people worldwide; however, few studies have examined the relationship between biomass fuel use and blood pressure. We sought to determine if daily biomass fuel use was associated with elevated blood pressure in high altitude Peru and if this relationship was affected by lung function. We analyzed baseline information from a population-based cohort study of adults aged ≥ 35 years in Puno, Peru. Daily biomass fuel use was self-reported. We used multivariable regression models to examine the relationship between daily exposure to biomass fuel smoke and blood pressure outcomes. Interactions with sex and quartiles of forced vital capacity were conducted to evaluate for effect modification. Data from 1004 individuals (mean age, 55.3 years; 51.7% women) were included. We found an association between biomass fuel use with both prehypertension (adjusted relative risk ratio, 5.0; 95% confidence interval, 2.6-9.9) and hypertension (adjusted relative risk ratio, 3.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-7.0). Biomass fuel users had a higher systolic blood pressure (7.0 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, 4.4-9.6) and a higher diastolic blood pressure (5.9 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, 4.2-7.6) when compared with nonusers. We did not find interaction effects between daily biomass fuel use and sex or percent predicted forced vital capacity for either systolic blood pressure or diastolic blood pressure. Biomass fuel use was associated with a higher likelihood of having hypertension and higher blood pressure in Peru. Reducing exposure to household air pollution from biomass fuel use represents an opportunity for cardiovascular prevention.
More Related Videos
05:18Measuring Carbon Content in Airway Macrophages Exposed to Carbon-Containing Particulate Matters
Published on: July 12, 2024
10:11Fundus Photography as a Convenient Tool to Study Microvascular Responses to Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Epidemiological Studies
Published on: October 22, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Factors Affecting Respiration
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Oxygen Therapy for Respiratory Failure
Oxygen therapy is vital in increasing and maintaining blood oxygen levels in PAH patients. As a result, it aids in reducing fatigue,...
Factors affecting Blood pressure
Physiological Factors:
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History
