Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 16, 2026
09:11
Design and Use of an Apparatus for Presenting Graspable Objects in 3D Workspace
Published on: August 8, 2019
6.2K
Digital Pain Drawings: Assessing Touch-Screen Technology and 3D Body Schemas
Shellie A Boudreau1, Susanne Badsberg, Steffan W Christensen
1Department of Health Science and Technology, Centre for Sensory Motor Interaction, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
The Clinical Journal of Pain
|March 11, 2015
Summary
Digital pain drawings on tablets offer similar reliability to paper, though sizes may vary slightly. Both 2D and 3D body schemas show consistency, but 3D may offer greater accuracy for pain representation.
Area of Science:
- Pain research
- Digital health technologies
- Human-computer interaction
Background:
- Pain drawings are crucial for assessing pain distribution.
- Traditional paper-based methods may have limitations.
- Digital platforms offer potential for improved data collection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the consistency and agreement of pain drawings between paper and tablet interfaces.
- To evaluate the reliability of 2D line drawings versus 3D body schemas for pain representation.
Main Methods:
- Participants (N=24 pain-free, N=29 chronic neck pain) created pain drawings on paper and tablet.
- A separate group (N=26) used 2D and 3D body schemas on a tablet.
- User experience was assessed via questionnaire.
Main Results:
- Pain drawings showed moderate to high consistency and agreement between paper and tablet.
- A slight bias was observed: smaller drawings on paper vs. tablet, and larger on 2D vs. 3D schema.
- Over a third of chronic pain patients preferred the 3D body schema for accuracy.
Conclusions:
- Touch-screen technology provides reliable pain drawings comparable to paper.
- 2D and 3D body schemas exhibit similar consistency and reliability.
- Further research is needed to confirm if 3D schemas enhance pain drawing accuracy.
