The twisted relation between Pnu and SWEET transporters
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Demonstration of Heterologous Complexes formed by Golgi-Resident Type III Membrane Proteins using Split Luciferase Complementation Assay
Published on: September 10, 2020
Michael Jaehme1, Albert Guskov1, Dirk Jan Slotboom1
1University of Groningen, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
The evolutionary relation between sugar and vitamin transporters from the SWEET and Pnu families is unclear. They have similar 3D structures, but differ in the topology of their secondary structure elements, and lack significant sequence similarity. Here we analyze the structures and sequences of different members of the SWEET and Pnu transporter families and propose an evolutionary pathway by which they may have diverged from a common ancestor. A 3D domain swapping event can explain the topological differences between the families, as well as the puzzling observation that a highly conserved and essential sequence motif of the SWEET family (the PQ loop) is absent from the Pnu transporters.
Related Concept Videos
Glucose Transporters
Facilitated diffusion-glucose transporters (GLUTs) are encoded by the solute-linked carrier (SLC) family 2, subfamily A gene family, or SLC2A. The 14 GLUT protein members are distributed into three classes:
Membrane Proteins
Secondary Active Transport
Secondary Active Transport
Secondary Active Transport
Membrane Transporters
Transporters are mainly composed of alpha-helices, built from bundles of ten or more helices traversing the plasma membrane. The solute-binding sites are located midway, where some of the helices are broken or distorted, making space for the binding site through...

