Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 16, 2026

05:28
Quantifying Corticolous Arthropods Using Sticky Traps
Published on: January 19, 2020
6.0K
Evaluating the metapopulation consequences of ecological traps.
Robin Hale1, Eric A Treml2, Stephen E Swearer2
1School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia robin.hale@unimelb.edu.au.
Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|March 13, 2015
Summary
Ecological traps, where environmental changes lead to poor habitat choices, can impact metapopulations. This study reveals traps are most severe when attractive, costly, and widespread, affecting high-fitness species most.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Conservation Biology
- Population Dynamics
Background:
- Ecological traps arise from environmental changes prompting maladaptive habitat selection.
- Research on ecological traps has primarily focused on local scales, neglecting metapopulation dynamics in heterogeneous landscapes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how local impacts of ecological traps scale up to affect metapopulation dynamics in spatially structured, heterogeneous landscapes.
- To identify key factors influencing the severity and consequences of ecological traps at the metapopulation level.
Main Methods:
- Developed and utilized a network-based metapopulation model.
- Evaluated six hypotheses concerning encounter probability, selection likelihood, fitness costs, and species vulnerability.
- Assessed the influence of spatial context on ecological trap effects.
Main Results:
- Ecological traps pose the greatest threat when they constitute a large proportion of available habitats, significantly reduce fitness, and are highly attractive.
- Species with higher intrinsic fitness are identified as more susceptible to the negative impacts of traps.
- Demonstrated that traps can, in rare cases, benefit metapopulations.
- Observed that preferences for natal-like habitats can exacerbate the effects of ecological traps.
Conclusions:
- The severity of ecological traps in metapopulations is contingent upon habitat availability, fitness costs, and attractiveness.
- Species-specific traits, particularly high intrinsic fitness, influence susceptibility to traps.
- Spatial context is crucial for understanding and managing ecological traps within metapopulations.
- The study highlights the need for landscape-scale considerations in ecological trap research and conservation efforts.
Keywords:
dispersalhabitat selectionhuman-induced rapid environmental changenatal habitat preference inductionsource–sink dynamicstopologyMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Social Traps
27.1K
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
27.1K
Conservation of Declining Populations
13.7K
Conservation of declining population focuses on ways of detecting, diagnosing, and halting a population decline. The approach uses methods to prevent populations from going extinct.
13.7K
What are Populations and Communities?
38.8K
Overview
38.8K
Habitat Fragmentation
22.1K
Habitat fragmentation describes the division of a more extensive, continuous habitat into smaller, discontinuous areas. Human activities such as land conversion, as well as slower geological processes leading to changes in the physical environment, are the two leading causes of habitat fragmentation. The fragmentation process typically follows the same steps: perforation, dissection, fragmentation, shrinkage, and attrition.
22.1K
Conservation of Small Populations
17.8K
Small population sizes put a species at extreme risk of extinction due to a lack of variation, and a consequent decrease in adaptability. This weakens the chances of survival under pressures such as climate change, competition from other species, or new diseases. Large populations are more likely to survive pressures such as these, as such populations are more likely to harbor individuals that have genetic variants that are adaptive under new stresses. Small populations are much less...
17.8K
Predator-Prey Interactions
22.4K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
22.4K

