Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Inter-rater reliability in the diagnosis and classification of epileptic seizures and epilepsy in adults.

Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape·2026
Same author

Lacosamide is Associated with a Higher Treatment Persistence at 12 Months than Brivaracetam and Perampanel Despite Similar Efficacy.

Neurology and therapy·2025
Same author

Effectiveness and safety of adjunctive cenobamate in people with focal-onset epilepsy: Interim results after 24-week observational period from the BLESS study.

Epilepsia·2025
Same author

Artificial intelligence (ChatGPT 4.0) vs. Human expertise for epileptic seizure and epilepsy diagnosis and classification in Adults: An exploratory study.

Epilepsy & behavior : E&B·2025
Same author

Second-Line Medications for Women Aged 10 to 50 Years With Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy.

JAMA network open·2025
Same author

Efficacy and tolerability of low versus standard daily doses of antiseizure medications in newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. A multicenter, randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority trial (STANDLOW).

Epilepsia open·2025
Same journal

Who are you, ketamine? Good, evil, or dose- and context-dependent?

The Journal of physiology·2026
Same journal

Nuances in explaining the blunted erythropoietic response at altitude following recombinant human erythropoietin treatment at sea level.

The Journal of physiology·2026
Same journal

Sex-dependent responses to glucagon agonist therapies in obesity: Mechanistic insights and broader pharmacological implications.

The Journal of physiology·2026
Same journal

Brain sparing in fetal growth restriction: The double-edged sword of fetal hypoxaemia.

The Journal of physiology·2026
Same journal

Protein kinase Cδ and pharmacomechanical coupling: Re-envisioning cerebral vascular control.

The Journal of physiology·2026
Same journal

Improved subjective sleep quality in older adults by enhancing the GABAergic system in the sensorimotor cortex.

The Journal of physiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on the Primary Motor Cortex by Online Combined Approach with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
11:11

Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on the Primary Motor Cortex by Online Combined Approach with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Published on: September 23, 2017

9.8K

Interaction between visual and motor cortex: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Gionata Strigaro1,2, Diane Ruge1, Jui-Cheng Chen1,3,4

  • 1Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, University College London Institute of Neurology, London, UK.

The Journal of Physiology
|March 13, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to investigate visual-motor integration. They found that visual input inhibits motor cortex activity at rest but facilitates it during visual reaction tasks, suggesting a role in visuomotor processing.

More Related Videos

Stimulating the Lip Motor Cortex with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
12:09

Stimulating the Lip Motor Cortex with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Published on: June 14, 2014

19.9K
Combined Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Electroencephalography of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex
07:42

Combined Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Electroencephalography of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex

Published on: August 17, 2018

16.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on the Primary Motor Cortex by Online Combined Approach with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
11:11

Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on the Primary Motor Cortex by Online Combined Approach with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Published on: September 23, 2017

9.8K
Stimulating the Lip Motor Cortex with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
12:09

Stimulating the Lip Motor Cortex with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Published on: June 14, 2014

19.9K
Combined Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Electroencephalography of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex
07:42

Combined Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Electroencephalography of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex

Published on: August 17, 2018

16.9K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Motor Control
  • Visual Processing

Background:

  • The dorsal stream connects visual and motor systems, enabling visual input to influence motor cortex activity.
  • Understanding the neural basis of visuomotor interaction is crucial for explaining how visual information guides movement.
  • Previous research suggests visual input can reach the motor cortex with a short latency, but the precise pathways and mechanisms remain unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural basis of visuomotor interaction using paired transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).
  • To explore the functional connections between visual and motor cortices.
  • To determine the role of these connections in visuomotor integration during reaction-time tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Paired-pulse TMS was applied to the visual cortex (occiput) and the primary motor cortex (M1) in healthy volunteers.
  • Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle.
  • Stimulation effects were assessed at rest and during visual and auditory reaction-time tasks, and on short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI).

Main Results:

  • A conditioning stimulus over the occiput significantly suppressed test MEPs at rest with interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 18-40 ms.
  • During a visual reaction-time task, inhibition at an ISI of 40 ms was replaced by facilitation, while an auditory task showed no effect.
  • An occipital conditioning stimulus facilitated SICI at an ISI of 40 ms.

Conclusions:

  • Paired-TMS with ISIs of 18-40 ms can probe functional connections from visual to motor cortices.
  • These connections are inhibitory at rest, potentially involving inhibitory interneurons in the motor cortex.
  • The observed reversal from inhibition to facilitation during a visual reaction-time task highlights the role of these connections in visuomotor integration.