Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Multiplex Therapeutic Drug Monitoring by Isotope-dilution HPLC-MS/MS of Antibiotics in Critical Illnesses
Published on: August 30, 2018
Cross-border comparison of the Dutch and German guidelines on multidrug-resistant Gram-negative microorganisms
Jan Müller1, Andreas Voss2, Robin Köck3
1Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, hpc EB80, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Background:
In all European countries, hospital-acquired infections caused by Gram-negative multidrug-resistant microorganisms (GN-MDRO) are a major health threat, as these pathogens cannot be adequately treated anymore, or the start of effective antibiotic treatment is delayed. The efforts to limit the selection and spread of GN-MDRO remains a problem in cross-border healthcare, as the national guidelines on hygiene standards applicable for patients colonized or infected with GN-MDRO in hospitals are not harmonized between European countries.
Methods:
In order to point out the similarities and differences in the national guidelines of Germany and The Netherlands regarding GN-MDRO, guidelines were compared and an expert workshop was organized by the INTERREG IVa project EurSafety Health-net.
Results:
Both guidelines divide the Gram-negative organisms into subgroups based on bacterial species and antibiotic susceptibility patterns in order to define multidrug-resistant variants of these bacteria. However, the Dutch guideline defines that GN-MDRO Enterobacteriaceae requires testing for certain mechanisms causing antibiotic resistance, whereas the German guideline makes use of a newly created classification scheme, based on phenotypic characterization. Besides diagnostic issues, the main difference between the Dutch and German guideline is the divergent evaluation of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Special hygiene measures are required for all patients with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in The Netherlands, whereas the German guideline recommends special precautions only for those cases in which patients are colonized or infected with strains showing co-resistance to ciprofloxacin ("3MRGN").
Conclusions:
The usage of consistent terminology and harmonized diagnostic procedures would improve the possibilities for infection prevention, treatment and patient safety. Prevention of severe non-treatable infections and outbreaks due to MDRO, caused by an increased population seeking medical treatment abroad together with an increased number of highly susceptible individuals demands gathering of regional data, and data comparable between the two sides of the Dutch-German border. The necessity to cooperate multidisciplinary and across borders is required to prevent a post-antibiotic era - in which common infections and minor injuries may lead to death.
Insights
Harmonizing national guidelines on Gram-negative multidrug-resistant microorganisms (GN-MDRO) is crucial for cross-border healthcare. Differences in diagnostic approaches and hygiene recommendations between Germany and the Netherlands highlight the need for consistent terminology and procedures to prevent severe infections.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Microbiology
- Public Health Policy
Background:
- Hospital-acquired infections caused by Gram-negative multidrug-resistant microorganisms (GN-MDRO) pose a significant health threat in Europe.
- Lack of harmonized national guidelines for hygiene standards hinders the control of GN-MDRO in cross-border healthcare settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare national guidelines in Germany and The Netherlands concerning Gram-negative multidrug-resistant microorganisms (GN-MDRO).
- To identify similarities and differences in diagnostic approaches and hygiene recommendations for GN-MDRO between the two countries.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of national guidelines from Germany and The Netherlands.
- Organization of an expert workshop by the INTERREG IVa project EurSafety Health-net to discuss findings.
Main Results:
- Both guidelines categorize Gram-negative organisms by species and antibiotic susceptibility.
- The Dutch guideline mandates specific resistance mechanism testing for GN-MDRO Enterobacteriaceae, while Germany uses a phenotypic classification.
- Divergent evaluation of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae exists, with the Netherlands requiring special hygiene measures for all cases, and Germany for specific multi-resistant strains (3MRGN).
Conclusions:
- Consistent terminology and harmonized diagnostic procedures are essential for improving infection prevention, treatment, and patient safety.
- Cross-border cooperation and data gathering are necessary to prevent outbreaks of MDRO and a potential post-antibiotic era.
- Multidisciplinary and cross-border collaboration is vital to combat the threat of untreatable infections and to ensure patient safety in an increasingly interconnected healthcare landscape.
More Related Videos
08:04Quantitative Examination of Antibiotic Susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae Aggregates Using ATP-utilization Commercial Assays and Live/Dead Staining
Published on: February 8, 2019
09:07Author Spotlight: Accelerating Diagnostic Accuracy with Direct Identification of Gram-Negatives from Blood Culture Bottles
Published on: May 24, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Development of Antibiotic Resistance
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Steady-State, Minimum and Maximum Concentrations
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test