Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 16, 2026

A Quick Phenotypic Neurological Scoring System for Evaluating Disease Progression in the SOD1-G93A Mouse Model of ALS
Published on: October 6, 2015
Optimizing clinical trial design for multiple system atrophy: lessons from the rifampicin study.
Wolfgang Singer1, Phillip A Low
1Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA, singer.wolfgang@mayo.edu.
Designing clinical trials for Multiple System Atrophy (MSA) can be more efficient. Strategies were implemented to reduce patient numbers needed, enabling smaller, focused studies for this fatal neurodegenerative disorder.
Area of Science:
- Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Clinical Trial Design
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Multiple System Atrophy (MSA) is a fatal neurodegenerative disorder with no current treatments to slow progression.
- Clinical trials for MSA are challenged by the need for large patient cohorts, often necessitating international multi-center approaches.
- Uncertainty in patient numbers required for adequate statistical power has hindered disease-modifying treatment development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify and apply strategies to enhance statistical power and reduce the number of patients needed for Multiple System Atrophy (MSA) trials.
- To enable an oligocenter (fewer sites) approach for conducting clinical trials in MSA.
- To inform future trial designs by analyzing data from a recently conducted rifampicin trial in MSA.
Main Methods:
- Implemented specific inclusion/exclusion criteria to enroll patients with early, actively progressing MSA.
- Focused on minimizing patient dropouts and reducing variability in outcome scoring.
- Utilized pre-defined interim analyses to monitor trial progress.
- Employed a multi-center approach with rigorous site selection and training.
Main Results:
- The trial design allowed for a number needed to treat of only 50 patients per treatment arm.
- Recruitment goals were met within 12 months across ten selected sites.
- Achieved a dropout rate below 10% and successfully enrolled patients with actively progressing disease.
Conclusions:
- The strategies employed successfully improved trial power and feasibility for MSA studies.
- Data from this trial, though negative, provides valuable insights for powering future research.
- Recommendations for further improving trial design include rigorous site management, enhanced training, and the development of biomarkers for earlier diagnosis and progression tracking.
More Related Videos
04:53A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
04:45Lumbar Intrathecal Injection of SOD1-ASOs for Precise CNS Targeting and Predictive Efficacy in Human SOD1-G93A ALS Mice
Published on: February 24, 2026
Related Concept Videos
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Methods of Medium Optimization