Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.6K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.6K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

2.2K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
2.2K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

12.2K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
12.2K
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

853
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
853

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A quantitative proteomics dataset for assessment and prediction of low dose X-ray radiation exposure in mice.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

From FAIR to CURE: guidelines for computational models of biological systems.

NPJ systems biology and applications·2026
Same author

Variogram Modeling of Spatially Variant Early Response to Therapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2026
Same author

Quantifying cervical cancer radiotherapy care gap: Baseline assessment prior to implementation of a digital Health App.

Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology·2026
Same author

KGBN: Augmenting and optimizing logical gene regulatory networks using knowledge graphs.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Multiparametric MRI Markers Associated with Breast Cancer Risk in Women with Dense Breasts.

Cancers·2025
Same journal

Effective contrast-enhanced preprocessing for intracranial artery segmentation in digital subtraction angiography.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Improving Plan Quality in Adaptive Proton Therapy Using an Interactive Dose Modification Tool.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Technical Note: Real-Time MLC Control and Latency Measurement Optimization with External Verification.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Fetus-Specific Hematopoietic Stem Cell Dosimetry Framework for Leukemia-Relevant Target Cells During Prenatal Development.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Deep learning-based dose prediction to enhance planning efficiency in cervical brachytherapy with hybrid applicators.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum: Referenceless MR thermometry-a comparison of five methods (2017<i>Phys. Med. Biol</i>.<b>62</b>1-16).

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System
08:25

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System

Published on: April 11, 2018

16.2K

Bayesian network models for error detection in radiotherapy plans.

Alan M Kalet1, John H Gennari, Eric C Ford

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98195-6043, USA. Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98019-4714, USA.

Physics in Medicine and Biology
|March 14, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study developed Bayesian networks to detect errors in radiotherapy plans. These probabilistic models improve error detection accuracy, outperforming human experts in identifying potential issues during plan verification.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant
05:18

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant

Published on: October 6, 2023

2.1K
Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
08:17

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Published on: June 7, 2015

16.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System
08:25

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System

Published on: April 11, 2018

16.2K
Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant
05:18

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant

Published on: October 6, 2023

2.1K
Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
08:17

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Published on: June 7, 2015

16.3K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Radiotherapy plan errors pose risks to patient safety.
  • Current verification methods may not be fully comprehensive.
  • Probabilistic models offer a novel approach to error detection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To design and develop a probabilistic network for detecting errors in radiotherapy plans.
  • To integrate this network into initial plan verification processes.
  • To enhance the accuracy and efficiency of radiotherapy plan quality assurance.

Main Methods:

  • Developed Bayesian networks modeling radiotherapy plans.
  • Interviewed domain experts to define network topology and interdependencies.
  • Utilized Hugin Expert software and clinical data to populate conditional probability tables.
  • Trained networks on 4990 de-identified prescription cases over 5 years.

Main Results:

  • Achieved high accuracy in error detection for lung (AUC 0.88), brain (AUC 0.98), and female breast cancer (AUC 0.89) networks.
  • The brain network demonstrated superior performance compared to human experts (AUC 0.90 ± 0.01).
  • Networks effectively flagged potential errors in test scenarios with 1.5% introduced error rates.

Conclusions:

  • Probabilistic models, specifically Bayesian networks, are feasible and effective for radiotherapy plan error detection.
  • These models can serve as valuable decision support tools in radiotherapy plan verification.
  • The developed networks show potential for improving patient safety by reducing radiotherapy errors.