Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 16, 2026

03:40
Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Peripheral Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Without Left Ventricular Venting
Published on: January 17, 2025
988
Echocardiographic Ramp test for continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: do loading conditions matter?
Sirtaz Adatya1, Christopher T Holley1, Samit S Roy1
1Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
JACC. Heart Failure
|March 16, 2015
Summary
Aortic insufficiency (AI) and elevated mean arterial pressure (MAP) can cause false positive results for flow obstruction during echocardiographic ramp speed tests in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Echocardiography
Background:
- Ramp speed tests assess left ventricular assist device (LVAD) function by measuring left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) changes with increasing device speeds.
- Failure to reduce LVEDD indicates potential pump obstruction, a critical complication in LVAD patients.
- Aortic insufficiency (AI) and elevated mean arterial pressure (MAP) can impair the ability to effectively unload the left ventricle during ramp tests.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if continuous aortic insufficiency (AI) or elevated mean arterial pressure (MAP) are associated with false positive results for flow obstruction in echocardiographic ramp speed tests.
- To evaluate the impact of abnormal loading conditions on the interpretation of LVAD ramp tests.
- To identify predictors of device obstruction in continuous-flow LVADs.
Main Methods:
- Echocardiographic ramp speed tests were performed on patients with continuous-flow LVADs.
- Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) was plotted against device speed, and the slope of the linear function was calculated.
- Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the predictive value of LVEDD slope and other parameters for device obstruction, with device thrombosis confirmed by direct visualization.
Main Results:
- Abnormal LVEDD slopes (≥-0.16), indicative of obstruction, were observed in 36 out of 78 ramp tests (46%), with 18 true positives and 18 false positives.
- Patients with AI exhibited significantly flatter LVEDD slopes (-0.14 ± 0.17) compared to those without AI (-0.25 ± 0.11), suggesting obstruction despite similar lactate dehydrogenase levels.
- Elevated MAP (≥85 mm Hg) also correlated with abnormal LVEDD slopes, and combining LVEDD slope with lactate dehydrogenase concentration yielded a high area under the ROC curve (0.96) for predicting device obstruction.
Conclusions:
- Abnormal loading conditions, specifically AI and elevated MAP, can lead to false positive interpretations of flow obstruction during LVAD ramp speed tests.
- These findings highlight the importance of considering hemodynamic factors when interpreting ramp test results in LVAD patients.
- Accurate assessment of LVAD function requires accounting for conditions that affect left ventricular filling and unloading.
Keywords:
aortic insufficiencycontinuous-flow left ventricular assist deviceechocardiographic ramp testheart failurehemodynamicsmean arterial pressure thrombosis
