Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An Audience Facilitates Facial Feedback: A Social-Context Hypothesis Reconciling Original Study and Nonreplication.

Psychological reports·2023
Same author

Competition elicits arousal and affect.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2017
Same author

Replication Requires Psychological Rather than Statistical Hypotheses: The Case of Eye Movements Enhancing Word Recollection.

Frontiers in psychology·2017
Same author

Approach, avoidance, and affect: a meta-analysis of approach-avoidance tendencies in manual reaction time tasks.

Frontiers in psychology·2014
Same author

Affective modulation of attentional switching.

The American journal of psychology·2013
Same author

Gamma flicker elicits positive affect without awareness.

Consciousness and cognition·2012

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K

Attention and positive affect: temporal switching or spatial broadening?

R Hans Phaf1

  • 1Amsterdam Brain and Cognition Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, r.h.phaf@uva.nl.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|March 17, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Positive affect enhances attentional flexibility more than negative affect, particularly in tasks involving masked stimuli. This suggests mood influences how quickly we switch attention, not just the scope of our focus.

More Related Videos

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.6K
A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

9.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K
Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.6K
A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

9.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Affective Neuroscience

Background:

  • Evolutionary theories propose positive affect enhances attentional flexibility.
  • Previous research suggested positive affect broadens attention, reducing interference.
  • This study re-evaluates affective modulation of attention, focusing on flexibility.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether positive affect increases attentional flexibility compared to negative affect.
  • To differentiate between spatial broadening and attentional switching as explanations for mood effects on attention.
  • To examine the role of stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) in mood-dependent attentional modulation.

Main Methods:

  • Employed a masked-flanker task with positive and negative mood inductions.
  • Parametrically varied the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between flankers and target.
  • Measured interference effects under different mood states and SOAs.

Main Results:

  • Masking produced greater interference in negative moods than positive moods.
  • A crossover interaction between mood and SOA was observed.
  • Results contradicted a spatial broadening account of attention.

Conclusions:

  • Affective states modulate attentional flexibility, specifically the speed of switching attention.
  • The findings support an attentional flexibility account over a spatial broadening account.
  • Mood-contingent attentional dynamics are crucial for understanding cognitive processing.