Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 16, 2026

10:35
A Procedure to Study the Effect of Prolonged Food Restriction on Heroin Seeking in Abstinent Rats
Published on: November 11, 2013
11.8K
Extra (non-contingent) food does not affect behavioral tolerance to d-amphetamine's rate-decreasing effects
Christopher A Krebs1, Karen G Anderson1
1Department of Psychology, P.O. Box 6040, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506-6040, United States.
Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior
|March 17, 2015
Summary
Providing extra food pellets did not alter the development of drug tolerance in rats. This suggests that offsetting reinforcement loss does not significantly impact how tolerance to d-amphetamine develops.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Pharmacology
- Behavioral Science
Background:
- Drug tolerance is a reduced response to a drug after repeated use, necessitating higher doses for the same effect.
- Tolerance to drugs affecting operant behavior is linked to initial reinforcement loss.
- The impact of mitigating reinforcement loss on tolerance development remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if offsetting reinforcement loss influences the development of tolerance to d-amphetamine.
- To determine if providing non-contingent food pellets affects tolerance to d-amphetamine's impact on operant behavior in rats.
Main Methods:
- Rats were trained to press a lever for food pellets under a multiple schedule.
- Extra food pellets were administered non-contingently (variable-time schedules) in one component.
- The effects of d-amphetamine were assessed acutely and chronically (45 days) to quantify tolerance development.
Main Results:
- d-amphetamine produced a dose-dependent decrease in lever pressing and food pellet acquisition.
- Tolerance to d-amphetamine developed similarly in conditions with and without extra food pellets.
- Offsetting reinforcement loss did not differentially affect the development of tolerance.
Conclusions:
- Mitigating reinforcement loss, through non-contingent food delivery, did not significantly alter tolerance development to d-amphetamine.
- These findings suggest that the relationship between reinforcement loss and drug tolerance may be more complex than previously assumed.
- Further research is needed to explore other factors that might influence drug tolerance in operant behavior paradigms.
Related Concept Videos
Desensitization and Tachyphylaxis
3.5K
Tachyphylaxis is described as a rapid decrease in response to a drug after repeated or continuous administration of the same drug dose. It is a phenomenon where the body becomes less responsive to a particular substance or intervention over time, requiring higher doses or stronger interventions to achieve the same effect. It results from adaptive changes in the body's receptors, signaling pathways, or physiological processes that occur in response to prolonged exposure to a stimulus.
3.5K
Adrenergic Agonists: Indirect-Acting Agents
3.1K
Indirect-acting adrenergic agonists potentiate the effects of endogenous catecholamines through different mechanisms without directly binding to adrenoceptors.
One mechanism involves depleting stored catecholamines by displacing them from synaptic vesicles. These agents, known as "displacers," are transported into vesicles at the expense of noradrenaline. Examples include amphetamine and tyramine, which lack a catechol moiety, resulting in prolonged action, improved oral...
One mechanism involves depleting stored catecholamines by displacing them from synaptic vesicles. These agents, known as "displacers," are transported into vesicles at the expense of noradrenaline. Examples include amphetamine and tyramine, which lack a catechol moiety, resulting in prolonged action, improved oral...
3.1K

