Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 16, 2026

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
Published on: September 20, 2018
[How to write a good clinical review?]
1Prof. Dr. Bernd J. Krause, Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Gertrudenplatz 1, 18057 Rostock, Tel. 03 81/494 91-01, Fax -02.
Abstract:
Clinical reviews are an important part of the medical literature offering the reader condensed information on a specific topic. In radiology and nuclear medicine most clinical reviews have a subjective character as they have been written in a rather narrative way. Based on their low level of evidence these narrative reviews are frequently not being considered for establishment of clinical guidelines. The aim of this paper is to aid the reader in writing a good clinical review by highlighting the different aspects of a systematic review.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Purpose of Health Records I
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Preclinical Development: Overview

