Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
[The research on optical properties of four all-ceramic veneer materials]
Fei Gao1, Xiaoping Luo1, Ning Li1
1Department of Prosthodontics, Institute and Hospital of Stomatology, Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China.
Objective:
To analyze the color parameters and translucency of four frequently-used veneer materials.
Methods:
Forty disc specimens[(1.00±0.01) mm in thickness, 10 mm in diameter] were fabricated according to the manufacturer's instructions with IPS Empress(®) CAD[A2, high translucency (HT)], IPS e.max(®) Press(A2, HT), IPS e.max(®) CAD (A2, HT) and VITABLOCS(®) Mark II (A2) respectively and were divided into Groups A, B, C, D. All of the specimens were ground and polished on a grinding machine. Then color parameters (L*, a*, b*) and transmittance (τ) were measured using spectrocolorimeter and transmissivity testing device. The color parameters of the specimens were compared to the color parameters of A2 shade of Ivoclar Vivadent A-D shade guide. The data were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and mean values were compared by the Tukey's test (α = 0.05).
Results:
There was no statistical difference between the color parameters L*, a*, b* and C*ab of Group A and Group D (P > 0.05). But the color parameters of those two ceramic materials were statistically different from the color parameters of Group B and Group C (P < 0.05). There was no statistical difference between color parameters b* and C*ab of Group B and Group C(P > 0.05). However, the color parameters L* and a* of the two materials were statistically different(P < 0.05). The color differences (ΔE) between Group A, B, C, D and standard A2 were 6.05±0.12, 5.11±0.27, 3.73±0.27, 6.30±0.38 respectively. The transmittances of Group A, B, C, D were (29.69±0.31)%, (25.83±0.36) %, (28.92±0.47)% and (26.94±0.33)% respectively.
Conclusions:
The color parameters of these four materials are different. Their transmittance are relatively high but statistically different. The color difference (ΔE) between IPS e.max(®) CAD (A2, HT) and standard A2 is lowest among all the groups.
More Related Videos
08:29Multi-material Ceramic-Based Components – Additive Manufacturing of Black-and-white Zirconia Components by Thermoplastic 3D-Printing (CerAM - T3DP)
Published on: January 7, 2019
03:37Evaluating the Effects of Different Polishing Methods on Color Stability of Dental Restorations in Pediatric Dentistry
Published on: June 6, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Veneer
Other veneering techniques include plain-slicing, quarter-slicing, and rift-slicing. These...
Properties of Enantiomers and Optical Activity
Mortar Properties
Brick Durability, Strength, and Appearance
UV–Vis Spectroscopy: Woodward–Fieser Rules
Porosity in Cement Paste
The balance of water to cement in the mix is...