Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 16, 2026

07:47
Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
Published on: January 9, 2016
16.2K
A delay-specific differential outcomes effect in delayed matching to sample
K Geoffrey White1, Rebecca J Sargisson
1Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand, geoff.white@otago.ac.nz.
Learning & Behavior
|March 19, 2015
Summary
Researchers demonstrated a delay-specific differential outcomes effect (DOE) in pigeons. Accuracy improved at specific delays when rewards differed, supporting theories on reward expectancies in memory tasks.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Animal Behavior
- Learning and Memory
Background:
- Delay-specific remembering shows enhanced accuracy at certain retention intervals.
- The differential outcomes effect (DOE) improves accuracy across all delays with varied rewards.
- Existing DOE theories link effects to reward expectancies influencing stimulus control.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate a delay-specific differential outcomes effect (DOE).
- To test if differential outcomes at specific delays, and same outcomes at others, enhance accuracy selectively.
- To examine implications for theories attributing DOE to reward expectancies.
Main Methods:
- Four pigeons performed delayed matching-to-sample tasks with mixed within-session delays (e.g., 0.5, 5, 15 s).
- Differential reward durations (differential outcomes) were provided for correct choices at some delays.
- Same reward durations (same outcomes) were provided at other delays within the same session.
Main Results:
- Evidence of a delay-specific DOE was observed, with improved accuracy at delays featuring differential outcomes.
- Accuracy was higher when differential outcomes were used compared to when same outcomes were used.
- A standard DOE was confirmed in a separate experiment comparing all-same vs. all-differential outcomes.
Conclusions:
- The findings support the existence of a delay-specific differential outcomes effect.
- Results suggest that reward expectancies may exert influence selectively at specific delays.
- This provides valuable insights into the mechanisms underlying memory and decision-making under delayed reward conditions.
Related Concept Videos
Sign Test for Matched Pairs
480
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
480
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect
351
The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
351
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
6.9K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
6.9K

