Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Tilt Testing with Combined Lower Body Negative Pressure: a "Gold Standard" for Measuring Orthostatic Tolerance
Published on: March 21, 2013
Effect of alertness level and backrest elevation on skin interface pressure
Anathea Abad Pepperl1, Melissa Bucalan Rooney2, Angela Parker2
1Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA;
Introduction:
Critically ill patients may experience reduced mobility and sensation related to various pharmacologic therapies and treatments, making this patient population especially susceptible to pressure ulcers. An alert patient may be better able to reposition in response to discomfort, therefore preventing the development of pressure ulcers. However, little is known about the effect of an individual's alertness level on skin interface pressures. This study describes the effect of alertness level and backrest elevation on skin interface pressures.
Materials And Methods:
Fifty healthy participants were recruited from the Virginia Commonwealth University (Richmond, VA) population. Participants simulated each of 2 alertness levels (sedated or alert) while in 3 backrest elevations (30°, 45°, or 60°). Activity level, backrest elevation, and interface pressures were recorded continuously for 30 seconds. Random effects models were used to examine the effects of alertness level and backrest elevation on average and peak pressure. Participants had a mean age of 30 and 82% were female.
Results:
There was a significant interaction between alertness level and angle as related to average pressure (P < 0.0001) and peak pressure (P < 0.0001). Increases in backrest elevation increased average pressure and peak pressure. Interface pressures were generally greater when participants were simulating the alert state.
Conclusion:
These findings may indicate that interface pressure is a poor indicator of patient discomfort. Higher body mass index (BMI) was associated with higher average pressure (P < 0.0001), but lower peak pressure (P < 0.0001), suggesting better pressure distribution across the patient's body area. These findings are similar to previous studies in which low BMI is associated with increased pressure ulcer risk. .
More Related Videos
06:04Objective Nociceptive Assessment in Ventilated ICU Patients: A Feasibility Study Using Pupillometry and the Nociceptive Flexion Reflex
Published on: July 4, 2018
14:28Non-Invasive Monitoring of Microvascular Oxygenation and Reactive Hyperemia using Hybrid, Near-Infrared Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy for Critical Care
Published on: May 10, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure