Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Quantification of the Immunosuppressant Tacrolimus on Dried Blood Spots Using LC-MS/MS
Published on: November 8, 2015
Comparison of systemic mycophenolate mofetil with topical clobetasol in lichen planopilaris: a parallel-group,
Vahide Lajevardi1, Seyedeh Zahra Ghodsi1, Azadeh Goodarzi2
1Department of Dermatology, Razi Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Introduction:
Lichen planopilaris (LPP) is the most common cause of inflammatory immune-mediated cicatricial alopecia. If not diagnosed and treated properly, it may lead to irreversible hair loss with a devastating impact on quality of life. However, treatment can be a challenge. In an area lacking these sorts of studies, we conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to study the tolerability and therapeutic effects of topical clobetasol versus systemic mycophenolate mofetil (MMF).
Methods:
A randomized, assessor- and analyst-blinded controlled trial was conducted in 60 patients with LPP in Razi Dermatology Hospital, Tehran, Iran, between February and December 2013. Patients were treated with clobetasol lotion 0.05 % applied at night or oral MMF 2 g/day and were followed for 6 months. The Lichen Planopilaris Activity Index (LPPAI) was the primary measure of response to treatment.
Results:
Systemic MMF and topical clobetasol were equally effective in reducing the LPPAI over 6 months of treatment. Treatment tolerability was excellent in both groups and no serious irreversible adverse effects were detected. Satisfaction with treatment rose in the MMF group over time; however, it declined in the clobetasol group.
Conclusion:
Given the similar efficacy profiles, topical clobetasol seems to be a more suitable and reasonable choice for treatment of LPP than MMF.
Related Concept Videos
Skin Diseases and Disorders
Gram-positive Staphylococcus spp. and Streptococcus spp. are responsible for many of the most common skin infections. However, many...
Antifungal Agents

