Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance01:20

Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance

1.3K
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance (W), also known as Kendall's W, is a non-parametric statistical measure used to assess the agreement or concordance between multiple raters or judges when they rank a set of items. It is often used when you have ordinal data (ranks) and you want to see if there is consistency or consensus among the raters. It is widely applied in research areas such as psychology, medicine, and social sciences, where multiple judges are asked to rank or rate subjects...
1.3K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

10.6K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
10.6K
Types of Selection01:46

Types of Selection

46.6K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
46.6K
Calculating and Interpreting the Linear Correlation Coefficient01:11

Calculating and Interpreting the Linear Correlation Coefficient

8.6K
The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable, x, and the dependent variable, y. Hence, it is also known as the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. It can be calculated using the following equation:
8.6K
Extraction: Partition and Distribution Coefficients01:14

Extraction: Partition and Distribution Coefficients

5.6K
The distribution law or Nernst's distribution law is the law that governs the distribution of a solute between two immiscible solvents. This law, also known as the partition law, states that if a solute is added to the mixture of two immiscible solvents at a constant temperature, the solute is distributed between the two solvents in such a way that the ratio of solute concentrations in the solvents remains constant at equilibrium.
For extracting a solute from an aqueous phase into an...
5.6K
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient01:10

Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient

6.5K
In a linear calibration curve, there is a value called the calibration coefficient, denoted by 'r,' which measures the strength and the direction of association between two variables. The correlation coefficient value ranges from −1 to +1. A value of +1 indicates a perfect positive linear correlation, −1 denotes a perfect negative correlation, and 0 implies no correlation between the two variables. A positive correlation value establishes that as one variable increases, the...
6.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Establishment in a new habitat by polygenic adaptation.

Theoretical population biology·2017
Same author

The infinitesimal model: Definition, derivation, and implications.

Theoretical population biology·2017
Same author

THE PROBABILITY OF FIXATION OF A NEW KARYOTYPE IN A CONTINUOUS POPULATION.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2017
Same author

HABITAT PREFERENCE IN THE BOMBINA HYBRID ZONE IN CROATIA.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2017
Same author

How does epistasis influence the response to selection?

Heredity·2016
Same author

Speciation in peripheral populations: effects of drift load and mating systems.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2016
Same journal

The role of microbial resource mutualists in plant adaptation to abiotic environments.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2026
Same journal

Museum genomics links MC1R alleles to adaptive winter coat color polymorphism in the long-tailed weasel.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2026
Same journal

Repeated evolution of iridescence and hindwing tails is associated with morphometric flight proxies in skipper butterflies.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2026
Same journal

Temperature-dependent competition predicts contrasting outcomes of adjacent secondary contact zones in darters (Percidae:Etheostoma).

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2026
Same journal

Sex allocation of hermaphrodites in metapopulations with frequent population extinction and recolonization.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2026
Same journal

The phylogenetic signal of extinction through the rise and fall of early vertebrates: field of bullets or clustered strike?

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.7K

The interpretation of selection coefficients.

N H Barton1, M R Servedio2

  • 1Institute of Science and Technology, Am Campus 1, A-3400, Klosterneuburg, Austria. nick.barton@ist.ac.at.

Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution
|March 20, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Understanding evolutionary selection requires clear definitions. This study uses multilocus notation to differentiate direct and indirect selection, improving biological accuracy in evolutionary predictions.

Keywords:
Direct selectionindirect selectionkin selectionmultilocus selection

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.1K
A Protocol for Functional Assessment of Whole-Protein Saturation Mutagenesis Libraries Utilizing High-Throughput Sequencing
11:36

A Protocol for Functional Assessment of Whole-Protein Saturation Mutagenesis Libraries Utilizing High-Throughput Sequencing

Published on: July 3, 2016

11.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.7K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.1K
A Protocol for Functional Assessment of Whole-Protein Saturation Mutagenesis Libraries Utilizing High-Throughput Sequencing
11:36

A Protocol for Functional Assessment of Whole-Protein Saturation Mutagenesis Libraries Utilizing High-Throughput Sequencing

Published on: July 3, 2016

11.4K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Population Genetics

Background:

  • Theoretical techniques accurately predict genetic changes in populations under evolutionary forces.
  • Decomposing evolutionary forces into biologically relevant components remains challenging.
  • Interpreting selection and selection coefficients, especially in multilocus systems, lacks clarity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address challenges in defining and interpreting selection and selection coefficients.
  • To utilize multilocus notation for a more precise understanding of evolutionary selection.
  • To clarify the distinction between direct and indirect selection in evolutionary biology.

Main Methods:

  • Examination of selection coefficients within a multilocus notation framework.
  • Analysis of the flexibility of multilocus notation in identifying targets of selection.
  • Application of multilocus notation to differentiate between direct and indirect selection.

Main Results:

  • Multilocus notation reveals how its flexibility impacts the interpretation of selection coefficients.
  • Difficulties in distinguishing and quantifying direct versus indirect selection are highlighted.
  • The study demonstrates the capacity of multilocus notation to discriminate between direct and indirect selection.

Conclusions:

  • Multilocus notation provides a valuable tool for dissecting complex selection dynamics.
  • Clearer definitions and interpretations of direct and indirect selection are proposed.
  • This approach enhances the biological accuracy of evolutionary predictions.