[Prospective study of the new oral anticoagulants in private practice: cautious optimism]

The new direct oral anticoagulants (DOA) such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban or apixaban are an evolution in the management of patients requiring curative anticoagulation. However, behind the simplicity of prescribing and monitoring, several questions remain about their daily use. The aim of this prospective study was to measure the feelings of general practitioners (GP), angiologists (AP) and cardiologists (CP), potential prescribers of this new anticoagulant family.

Between December 2012 and May 2013, a questionnaire including five open questions and 11 questions using a positioning on an analogic visual scale (AVS 0 to 10) was subjected to GP, AP and CP in Alsace.

Responses from 224 physicians (150 GP, 35 AP and 39 CP) were collected. Thus, 83% of GP, 83% of AP and 100% of CP were prescribers of DOA. However, among these prescribing doctors, the feeling was not the same and the trend of prescription was lower in GP (2.0 [1.1-3.2] AVS units) than in AP (3.1 [2.0-5.6]) and in CP (5.0 [1.2-8.7]) (P<0.0001 in multivariate analysis). The female doctors tended to prescribe DOA in younger patients than male doctors (respectively 66.1 [52.5-76.7] vs. 75.0 [65.7-81.0] years; P=0.004). The DOA were more considered as progress by AP and CP (respectively 7.8 [5.3-9.0] and 7.9 [7.0-8.7] AVSu) than by GP (6.1 [4.8-8.2] AVSu; P=0.02 in multivariate analysis). The answer about the eventual replacement of vitamin K antagonists by the DOA was very mixed whatever the practitioner group (5.1 [3.0-7.8] AVSu; P=0.139). The ease to use and the lack of biological monitoring were the main arguments leading to the prescription but the attitude of practitioners was very balanced by the lack of experience on the bleeding risk and the lack of available antidote.

If the DOA are considered as an improvement for the physicians, the enthusiasm remains cautious whatever the type of practiced medicine. The results of clinical trials and the clinical experience should better appreciate the ongoing change in the field of anticoagulation.